Why should it be that way though? After all, if the Lakers were playing the LA Lightning with Kobe and their 4 worst players (and nobody on the bench), the Lakers would still win by 50. And the Lightning has players like Lamond Murray, Bryon Russell and Tyus Edney. Kobe would still destroy them and easily be able to win a game.
It wouldn't be boring, it woud be realisitc.
Division V is like the league I played in at the local rec center. One of my teammates played pro ball in Europe, I played HS Varsity and was invited to walk on at a D1 school, and that was about it. We DOMINATED the league because he'd score about 40 points a night and I had about 10 steals a night. Imagine if he was actually good enough to play in the NBA or I was Rajon Rondo (my equivalent...though my hands are about half the size of his), we wouldn't even have to try.
Someone like Bronson, the absolute best player in the world (at least one of the 3 best), should be able to propel his team to Division 1 with ease, only then should he not be able to single-handedly win a championship.
After all, if you put Lionel Messi on RĂ¡pido de Bouzas, they'd be in the top division within 3 years.
That's why none of the D-League MVPs have ever been a legitimate NBA starter, because anyone who is good enough to star in the NBA is too good to play in any lower league.
Bronson probably has a 45 in vertical, can run like Monta Ellis, can shoot like Ray Allen in his prime, can D up like Gary Payton and can pass like Steve Nash, so why was he not good enough to keep a team in Division 3?
I LOVE Buzzerbeater, but this is a major flaw about the game. Either salaries need to come down (Bronson went from about 60 000 to 200 000 in a season) or the high-salary players' impact needs to be increased. Bronson should have been averaging about 7 steals a game in Division 3...