BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Moratorium on ALL new changes for one year

Moratorium on ALL new changes for one year

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
182276.8 in reply to 182276.7
Date: 4/21/2011 7:44:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Ofc it's been tested with centers with SB and SF's with good OD-ID... ¡

BB-Charles always said SB was important(i think he said it like some season ago) but the case is that we haven't see any team being a Champion because of his SB training. Sb effect is so litle, but the effect on the salary is so high.


BB's changed on the past the zones, introduced defensive changes/help to make it more real(because on the past when you were using a zone, the players were defending m2m). At the begining the zones were a joke and weren't well designed with defensive changes in every play.

Managers complained a lot and they fixed the issue and the game improved a lot with this change on the GE.

If we trust your argument, managers can't complain when they see something doesn't work right.


This Post:
00
182276.9 in reply to 182276.8
Date: 4/21/2011 7:48:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
We're going off topic here, but I'd feel differently if I saw it tested a considerable amount. I don't think BB has enough players trained to run the tests to the point where the sample size is large enough.

For the purposes of this thread - the difference lies in the form of argument presented. This is why I think it would be good to step back for a while and let managers play the game as is.

This Post:
00
182276.10 in reply to 182276.9
Date: 4/21/2011 7:56:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
You were completly shut down on this exact topic in another thread by multiple people including GMs and coaches in the NBBA and division one in Europe so you now just raise your same illogical and incorrect points in another thread. One change that they shouldn't have made was the ability to rate forum posts with a negative.

This Post:
00
182276.11 in reply to 182276.10
Date: 4/21/2011 8:02:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Why so rude? The other thread contained good discussion, but was derailed by some unrelated arguments and disagreements over terminology. On my actual point, the consensus is split at best, and nobody really knows enough to call my theory "right" or "wrong."

Anyways, this is really deviating from the original post, so just forget I mentioned 2-3 for the purposes of this thread. I didn't make this thread because of 2-3.

This Post:
11
182276.12 in reply to 182276.11
Date: 4/21/2011 8:29:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
You are right the consensus was split. Everyone (GMs, NBBA, Div 1 etc) against you.

As for your main point. So you really think the best thing they could do for this game would be to stop developing it for a year? Great idea.

This Post:
11
182276.13 in reply to 182276.12
Date: 4/21/2011 9:45:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Sorry, but I'm sick of this. If you misunderstood what was actually being argued, that's your loss. However, you're derailing this thread for no particular reason, and have intentionally ignored or misunderstood the point I'm trying to get across, which certainly has merit. Misunderstandings seem to be a common theme in this thread.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 4/21/2011 9:45:32 PM

From: loldots

This Post:
11
182276.14 in reply to 182276.12
Date: 4/22/2011 12:11:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
Except BB-Charles, who said that, in their tests, the 2-3 was fine.

Don't let facts get in the way of your odd rant, though.

From: Weather

This Post:
00
182276.15 in reply to 182276.10
Date: 4/22/2011 2:15:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
I find it odd that these "illogical and incorrect" points have garnered six people to +1 RiseandFire's first post.

The greatest of all time.
This Post:
00
182276.16 in reply to 182276.15
Date: 4/22/2011 3:50:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Online games are always a work in progress, so no development for a year will absolutely kill this game.

We do not see many changes here anyway and sometimes I wish the developers would be much more active and even do some radical changes - if we had a one year moratorium, this would be a reason for me to quit.

This Post:
00
182276.17 in reply to 182276.16
Date: 4/22/2011 4:00:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
the OP didn't say "no development," it said don't implement any changes that aren't cosmetic.

I'm not anti-change. I'm just anti-reactionary change. If something is to be changed, it's sensible to give BBs time to think about it, and to remove the expectation of immediate change from the minds of an impatient community.

For this reason, a moratorium could be good for the development of the game.

This Post:
00
182276.18 in reply to 182276.17
Date: 4/22/2011 4:06:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
the OP didn't say "no development," it said don't implement any changes that aren't cosmetic.


Isnt that the same? I dont see a difference, "cosmetic" changes are necessary, but major changes need to be done sooner or later and I dont want to wait years for them.

Advertisement