BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Small Nations

Small Nations

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Jay_m

To: Tuck
This Post:
00
259663.8 in reply to 259663.7
Date: 6/28/2014 4:20:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
It doesn't. Those of us in small nations have raised this issue many times.

This Post:
00
259663.9 in reply to 259663.8
Date: 6/28/2014 12:18:07 PM
Kings XI Punjab
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
223223
Second Team:
Kings XI Punjab II
Nothing gonna happen mate, just look at last time's conversation, it ended in something like having a second team instead of merging micronations.

This Post:
00
259663.10 in reply to 259663.9
Date: 7/2/2014 8:50:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12661266
From my end ot makes no difference. Teams can still be based in their nation just share a comp with some overs. There has been one active user in Pakistan for about a year now. A couple sign up and fall over just as quick.

It just seems obvious to me that they should merge. There should be a full Div I and at close to half the Div IIs full in a comp.

We need to do things to build up numbers and making it interesting from these smaller nations seems a no brainier to me.

Even if NTs are kept apart etc still its to give users in small nations someone to play and talk to and some level of challenge in doing well.


This Post:
00
259663.11 in reply to 259663.10
Date: 7/7/2014 11:50:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
It is a no-brainer. However, developers decided to take the easy way out with the second team. Seems to me it would be rather difficult to implement stuff with the second team being in a micro nation, so they went away from micro-nations completely as of now. I wish the second team was in a micro-nation. I would have payed the 10 bucks gladly, it was disappointing to see the second team option handled this way.