BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > overextension tax, week 14

overextension tax, week 14

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
311690.8 in reply to 311690.7
Date: 10/4/2021 5:55:19 AM
Team Nook
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
322322
Second Team:
Team Nook Yellow
I think the idea of not paying salaries for players that are unable to play any competitive games that week should be considered. So if you buy a player that is unable to play playoff games and your still in the playoffs you don’t pay their salary that week. It would give managers the chance to plan for the next season without having to worry about paying an extra salary for a player they can’t use.

This Post:
00
311690.9 in reply to 311690.8
Date: 10/4/2021 6:08:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
Yes, that is the perfect suggestion to do I think.

And I would add no overextension tax this week because we don't really know if the economy of team is overextended. This is pre-season and a lot of things can change.

I call it a bug in the sense that this situation goes totally against the spirit of the "overextension tax". I mean my salaries right now are low for div.2 but I had to pay overextension tax (WTF?)

And I would also eliminate the training exception in order to calculate that tax. This is mixing two different things and it is confusing. The spirit of the overextension tax is clear. But the way it is implemented is rather a tool to force managers to build through training. If you want to do that, don't call it overextension tax.

Last edited by jesus.sanchez at 10/4/2021 6:08:43 AM

This Post:
00
311690.11 in reply to 311690.10
Date: 10/4/2021 6:23:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
He will play in division two where my team is not, by any means, "overextended", rather the opposite.

This Post:
00
311690.12 in reply to 311690.10
Date: 10/4/2021 7:31:54 AM
Team Nook
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
322322
Second Team:
Team Nook Yellow
I agree their salary should be paid this week, as there is a competitive game in this economic week. What I suggest would allow 2 extra weeks to buy players for the following season.

It would allow you to buy players during the playoffs without having to pay their salaries giving you more time to prepare for next season. If you promote by winning the playoffs you literally get a week to buy players before the season starts which for some players isn’t enough to get the right players in.

From: Omri

This Post:
00
311690.14 in reply to 311690.7
Date: 10/4/2021 9:17:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
What?
Offseason processes starts before the NT finals..
Last season, we got draftees around 4pm (gmt +3)..

From: Omri

This Post:
00
311690.15 in reply to 311690.7
Date: 10/4/2021 9:17:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
What?
Offseason processes starts before the NT finals..
Last season, we got draftees around 4pm (gmt +3)..

This Post:
00
311690.17 in reply to 311690.12
Date: 10/5/2021 3:57:30 AM
Hortatus
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
13021302
Personally buying players during the playoffs in progress (without participating in them), it seems to want to take advantage of the increase in costs at the beginning of the season.
So in my opinion there is a reasoning: you can try to save on purchases, but in the meantime you pay your salary for a week that you don't play.
There are almost 5 days to shop between the last economic update of the season and the first game of the following season (in which the form will not change even if taken before the training update).
In reality, in many leagues, purchases cannot be made during certain periods of time.

I would have always liked more "break" between the end of one season and the beginning of the next .. just to be able to think and fine-tune the squad without having to hurry .. but I see that most of the managers there think differently ..

Anche tu a caccia di "Riconoscimenti"?! Vieni in federazione: Achievements hunters (fedid=19269) (solo per supporter, se non lo sei e hai dubbi chiedi pure, spero di poter esserti di aiuto)