BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Draft level

Draft level

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
55804.8 in reply to 55804.7
Date: 11/1/2008 3:13:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
But it would make some 19y desirable. Now, it`s pretty hard to find usefulness in 19y because of that.


Please give me 3 19yo potential 6+ C trainees with 7 at ID, IS and RB. In 3 seasons of training I can sell them for 3-4m a piece at the age of 21/22. That's quite a profitable draft, 1m per draftee per season.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 11/1/2008 3:14:08 PM

This Post:
00
55804.10 in reply to 55804.9
Date: 11/1/2008 5:34:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
we talking in generality, takes the best 18y and the best 19y player, they are in the same level. do you find it logical..?

there is no doubt that required some chagnes in this issue.. and not just between 18y-19y, whole draft system, after six seasons we must taking one step ahead with the rookies level .

This Post:
00
55804.11 in reply to 55804.9
Date: 11/1/2008 5:38:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
I honestly prefer a 18y old C with average IS, ID, REB than a respectable IS ID REB thats 19y, because in one season I can make the 18y at least strong in all 3.

All I`m saying is to build up the 19y a little bit, because its the logical thing to do. They are supposed to have "spent a year longer in college", thus having a longer training.


This Post:
00
55804.13 in reply to 55804.11
Date: 11/1/2008 6:06:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
All I`m saying is to build up the 19y a little bit, because its the logical thing to do. They are supposed to have "spent a year longer in college", thus having a longer training.


Or they just weren't ready to take the step to the pro's at 18, which forced them to stay another year in college to reach minimum requirements...

Making the trainees better every two seasons isn't a solution to any problem. Just train your players adequate and your team will develop sufficiently.

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.
This Post:
00
55804.14 in reply to 55804.13
Date: 11/1/2008 6:39:13 PM
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
190190
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
It certainly makes sense that older draft choices should be no better than 18 year olds. If they were good already at 18 they would have been in that draft. Isn't that pretty similar to how it actually is in NBA? I would at least guess that a talent usually don't wait for another year and rather are a late choice instead of waiting a year to be early pick.

From: LA-Nir

This Post:
00
55804.15 in reply to 55804.14
Date: 11/1/2008 7:44:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
wrong wrong wrong this days there is an Israeli player called Omry caspi he was almost sure to be piked in early second round the last draft or even the end of the first round but he wanted to give it another year of practice to make sure he will be piked first round this year witch he will most probably will so the guy was good for the pros (if we consider the NBA pros in this scenario and europ as a passing station) but he rather sty another year make himself batter and be piked next year

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
This Post:
00
55804.16 in reply to 55804.15
Date: 11/1/2008 8:14:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
There will always be exceptions of course, an exception doesn't make the common wrong.

It's crazy to raise the level of trainees every 2 seasons. Imagine that you are a new starting team in season 15 1 week before the draft and suddenly you get 3 players who are twice as skilled as the rest of the squad, because the minimum of the rookies is proficient already, that's crazy.

The youth system has always worked at hattrick, where the maximum of youthplayers is 'excellent' at the mainskill (except for goalkeepers). Top class rookies will always be of huge value, ok 19 yo's might be a little worse than 18yo, but I would certainly prefer respectable 19yo's over mediocre 18yo's.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 11/1/2008 8:14:14 PM

This Post:
00
55804.17 in reply to 55804.16
Date: 11/1/2008 8:29:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
i gave one example who i am sure there are more out there i will give you another example if a kid is not mature to go to first grade at the first year he will sty another year in kindergarten so he will develop more docent mean that if he was going to be in first grade in the first year he whodunit make it but it give him a batter chance hens he is more ready for it i do agree there is no need to raise the draft minimum every 2 seasons but you might want to consider that higher division teams will get batter players no potential but with batter skills this just make more seance that way

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
This Post:
00
55804.18 in reply to 55804.17
Date: 11/1/2008 8:42:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
dot

if he was going to be in first grade in the first year he whodunit make it but it give him a batter chance hens he is more ready for it


Exactly, so he wasn't skilled enough to join the draft at the BB age of 18, so he needed to wait another year to join the draft at the BB age of 19. So you example does fit the statement perfectly.

I believe we are saying the same right?

Advertisement