Because the people buying these players to win certain games like cups or PO finals aren't worried about the money. As long as they don't go so far into debt that they'll bot out, it makes no difference.
I will not disagree with you there. However, lets face the facts. It will be made more difficult to do it losing so much more money than NONE at all and make it less appealing.
For the need to have such player for some period in the team as the obligation, well, what if I buy too high payed player and will not count my finances 4 weeks in advance, does it mean that I have to sell someone else to not go into red numbers?
This sucks too.
You are right. That would suck to go in red. It also means that you probably shouldn't have that player if you can't afford him realistically. What you are pretty much saying is what we are trying to combat. People getting players they can't afford just to win a game and selling them not to pay salary.
I mean leaving strategy, it means boost the team for important match, win the missing trophy and leave the game. In this case you don't care about bankruptcy after the match.
In that scenario they are also LEAVING. So once again it will put a strain if they don't leave as little as it may be it is still a strain. If they are leaving that will mean that "scumbag" player which is what I would call them is gone and so will one of those players.
MP Inclusive - I have to call your bullshit. When I first played this game many seasons ago I knew what you were just talking about would not work just by common sense and later discovery of forums. You are in D 3 if you dont know how things work by now I am baffled.
Also guys, I just want to point out that even though I am in D 5 I was about to promote to D 3 about 3 seasons ago and stopped playing. So don't think I am some noob haha I joined back up a month ago and have gone 8-1 and went from 7th to second in my weak division and set to compete with this same squad in D 4.