BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New "Talent" concept.

New "Talent" concept.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Ashurri

This Post:
00
204125.82 in reply to 204125.79
Date: 12/27/2011 3:13:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7979
Higher salary floor would work? But the TV contract will be the same as the salary floor.... maybe a team can have his TV contract slashed proportional to the quality of his players compared to other teams?

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
204125.83 in reply to 204125.82
Date: 12/27/2011 3:42:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Why should the TV contract be the same as the salary floor? It isn't now depending what division you are in.

From: Ashurri

This Post:
00
204125.84 in reply to 204125.83
Date: 12/27/2011 3:51:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7979
No idea, two seasons in a row the TV contract was 100% exactly the same amount as my salary floor. I guess I'm the only person in the whole of BB to experience that.

From: yodabig

This Post:
11
204125.85 in reply to 204125.84
Date: 12/27/2011 3:55:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
No, I think in all division IIs all around the world the TV money is the same as the salary floor, but it is different in division I, III, IV, V or VI. From the game manual:

The salary floor depends upon your league's television revenue:

Division I: 120% of TV money

Division II: 100% of TV money

Division III,IV: 80% of TV money

Division V,VI: 60% of TV money




Last edited by yodabig at 12/27/2011 3:56:39 AM

This Post:
00
204125.87 in reply to 204125.86
Date: 12/31/2011 7:10:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
The matureness of players skills should rise upon the league level that they are drafting for, but there should be a price for that - their first year salary must be higher, and they cannot be sold, but just fired.

Basically the aim is to allow higher league's teams the abillity to (realy) train players, but not allowing the the advantage of having better assets doing that.

It is already the case now - a team that played more seasons has much higher assets on this game - arena size, players value, etc.
Basicaly there is a problem with the competitiveness due to that, and the draft should not make this issue a bigger one than it is already is (and it is already a crucial issue).

This Post:
00
204125.88 in reply to 204125.87
Date: 12/31/2011 7:23:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Basically the aim is to allow higher league's teams the abillity to (realy) train players, but not allowing the the advantage of having better assets doing that.


nearly all teams of my team train player, really.

This Post:
00
204125.89 in reply to 204125.88
Date: 12/31/2011 7:45:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
218218
How about some kind of "salary cap" for players for example younger than 25 years ( and staying in team, they got drafted at?)? Like in real life, where first picks, like Lebron has had salary of 4mill per year, even thought he was worth way more those 4 years. I think there should be some salary cap too, lets say you drafted all time great potencial guy, and first 7 years his salary would be like 50% of his pottencial salary, so teams could train their talent. Low league teams, could promote with those guys, they also would have all possibilities to train those players off-pozition, since oponents would be so weak to compare to that talent. This would heavily increase talent on the market of ready to play in highest division teams.

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 12/31/2011 7:47:22 AM

This Post:
00
204125.90 in reply to 204125.89
Date: 12/31/2011 7:51:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
we don't lack talent on the market for div one teams, at least when i looked at i always can put a lot of them into my bookmarks.

The thing i don't like at it is it a big advantage, which makes loosing for draft pick quite attractive and you already ghave today an economical advantage in training your own players.

This Post:
00
204125.91 in reply to 204125.88
Date: 12/31/2011 8:53:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Basically the aim is to allow higher league's teams the abillity to (realy) train players, but not allowing the the advantage of having better assets doing that.


CrazyEye:
nearly all teams of my team train player, really.
I've verified what you said here (guess why)...
You have a single player that is between 18-21yo, and his not one that you have drafted.

This is a fact.

Now anyone can think for his own what does it mean, and why you calimed whatever you claimed here.

This Post:
00
204125.92 in reply to 204125.91
Date: 12/31/2011 9:06:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Basically the aim is to allow higher league's teams the abillity to (realy) train players, but not allowing the the advantage of having better assets doing that.


CrazyEye:
nearly all teams of my team train player, really.
I've verified what you said here (guess why)...
You have a single player that is between 18-21yo, and his not one that you have drafted.

This is a fact.

Now anyone can think for his own what does it mean, and why you calimed whatever you claimed here.


and i trained 3 of my player since day 1, and 2 other over multiple seasons. This doesn't include 2 dudes i am currently training. So i "designed" 7 dudes of my 10 men rotation.

Also i am still training players ;)

Why is it bad when i decide to search my trainee, who fit to my team?

Advertisement