1. Is there a difference in training effectiveness between a Basic, Competent, Advanced, ..., etc trainer when training Free Throws, Stamina, or Game Shape?
2. Is there a difference, even marginally, between getting a player 49 mins training and getting him, lets say, 60 mins of training. The reason I ask is because I notice that the training frame on our Manage My Team screen will rank players, regardless of age, by minutes played at the position. 48+ isn't equal. If one player played 56 mins at PG in a Passing training regimen, he will be ranked higher on the list with a 48+ label than the player with 49 minutes of training also with a 48+ label.
3. Is the skill level increase from a 1 (Atrocious) to a 2 (Pitiful) in a skill like Passing any different than an increase from an 19 (Colossal) to a 20 (Legendary) in the same skill (Passing)? In other words, is the skill increase from level to level linear, or is it curved (like a logarithmic curve or something to that effect)?
4. Is there a stronger home court advantage during the playoffs when compared to during a regular season game?
5. Will specialties on Staff Members be more effective the higher skill level they are? For example, will an Advanced Crowd Involvement PR-Manager do more for your home court advantage than a Basic Crowd Involvement PR-Manager would?
6. Is it impossible to max out a Hall of Fame draft pick if drafted at 19 years old, given that they have starting total skill points in the 50's or lower? If so, why even create them? It gives false hope to the manager and could potentially waste A LOT of time.
1. No.
2. No. The ranking doesn't matter.
3. I guess you're asking if it's harder to train a high skill than a low one, right? In that case, the simple answer would be yes. If you're asking if 20 - 19 is greater than 2 - 1 then no.
4. No.
5. No.
6. Can any player truly be maxed out? How would we even calculate what a player can reach since training varies by a lot of factors. Why have a 30yo Hall of Famer in a new team? These players will serve their purpose, but it is not implied that every player can or should reach his potential. The false hope is not implied either, it is something you, the managers, constructed. We cannot control that.
hi martin.
1. I would like to hear your opinion about my
idea: Add opportunity to draw play - calls.
I think that can help a lot....
2. Suggestions for preparing for the expansion of the game ... I wanted to propose to expand the preparations and tactics for each game. Before each game, each team will get a page with the pros and cons of the opponent scores a three-or put a bullet inside. Where its weaknesses and where she sees strong advantages and disadvantages and to activate the team accordingly.
3. I would like to hear your opinion about my
idea: Add opportunity to draw play - calls.
I think that can help a lot....
4.I thought of an idea to make the Cup more interesting to get all the bots and make houses with four teams in each House. One of each League. And then there's more interest and more likely to be surprises.
5. make BBB for all leagus.
Hi, it's Marin, not Martin, and this thread is not a suggestions or feature request thread. I know others have already used it just for that, but I guess I have to draw the line somewhere. Have you noticed that your no.1 statement is the same as no.3? To give you a quick answer, no we don't plan on implementing any of the mentioned suggestions.
No Buzzerbeater App = no long term future for the game
Am I a pessimist or a realist?
You can see the future? I'd call you a psychic
I would like you to increase the number of Saved Searchs from 3 to 6, for example. And the same with the number of Favourite players/staff/games: from 50 to 100, for example. I think that both quantities are currently too small to be completely useful for the most experienced managers.
We'll think about it.
Last edited by BB-Marin at 5/7/2015 7:38:56 AM