BuzzerBeater Forums

Canada - II.4 > Season 40

Season 40

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
289733.83 in reply to 289733.82
Date: 11/15/2017 2:50:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
I'm assuming because of all the points he got while playing at the C position. I'm very surprised Sutter got voted 3rd after only starting 2 games in this league

This Post:
11
289733.84 in reply to 289733.83
Date: 11/15/2017 8:23:31 PM
April Rain
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
Second Team:
Chiori
Yea, I had a similar situation with a guard last year. He played about 2-4 games and he got voted in as a starting PG last year. That guard scored a lot of points, so I assume all stars might be based on the scoring outbursts of players

This Post:
11
289733.85 in reply to 289733.84
Date: 11/16/2017 3:06:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
That would make sense to me. My SF posted a few 30+ games but by no means would he have been the most popular SF in our conference.

This Post:
11
289733.86 in reply to 289733.85
Date: 11/17/2017 6:14:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
197197
Congrats on making the final 4 in the tourney Ben!

This Post:
11
289733.87 in reply to 289733.86
Date: 11/17/2017 6:46:44 PM
April Rain
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
Second Team:
Chiori
Thanks, I want to try to win it all...at the very least, make it to the finals. Unfortunately, I landed Kings in the next round, where I was hoping for either Gunners with his decreased GS and injuries or Psyczyna with his lack of depth. In my opinion, just landed the favorite to win it all..Oh well, time to plan.

From: Ben Jet
This Post:
11
289733.88 in reply to 289733.87
Date: 11/18/2017 4:56:14 PM
April Rain
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
Second Team:
Chiori
Well, it seems like there's now team stats displayed in our league page. That's definitely a new and interesting thing, as well as convenient...At the same time, it's now easier for opponents to game plan VS your squad.

Any thoughts on it?

For me, I'm a little surprised my rating is at 238.4...where the second best Calgary is at 150. To confirm, I double check Naismith and found the highest rating for a Naismith team was around 180. I think it might be a typo and actually 138.4

This Post:
11
289733.89 in reply to 289733.88
Date: 11/18/2017 6:04:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
That's definitely the one piece that sticks out. I'd also like to point out the steals per game - Calgary with 17 and Mayne with 15. Those are some impressive numbers. I would love to see this expanded on in the future and totally agree that it makes scouting teams much easier.

This Post:
11
289733.90 in reply to 289733.88
Date: 11/18/2017 6:27:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
262262
For me, I'm a little surprised my rating is at 238.4...where the second best Calgary is at 150. To confirm, I double check Naismith and found the highest rating for a Naismith team was around 180. I think it might be a typo and actually 138.4


The weird part about that is is under team stats, your team has a rating of 63.6. In fact, it doesn't look like anyone's rating on the league page match what it says on the team page.

Last edited by Mountaineer at 11/18/2017 6:40:13 PM

This Post:
00
289733.91 in reply to 289733.90
Date: 11/18/2017 6:40:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
By the way, what happened to the page displaying running totals for things like total career games played, points scored, rebounds, etc? I think you used to be able to see this in the hall of fame tab.

Last edited by Red Auerbach at 11/18/2017 6:43:46 PM

This Post:
00
289733.92 in reply to 289733.91
Date: 11/18/2017 6:45:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
262262
I think all that is still under the career stats tab for each player.

This Post:
00
289733.93 in reply to 289733.92
Date: 11/18/2017 6:47:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
It would be nice to get that table for the whole team back tough

Last edited by Red Auerbach at 11/18/2017 6:48:43 PM

Advertisement