BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > No Look Inside for a season.

No Look Inside for a season.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
199504.84 in reply to 199504.83
Date: 11/25/2011 6:21:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
102102
...because players have more secondaries and teams are more balanced


Honestly i think the opposite is the case. In relative terms the secondairies are probably higher in the lower divisions, compared to the main skills.

This Post:
00
199504.85 in reply to 199504.84
Date: 11/25/2011 6:25:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Yes, in relative. So in D.IV you find:

JS 11, JR9
OD 11, HA 9
DR 10, PA 8

In D.I you can find:

JS 16, JR 13
OD 17, HA 13
DR 15, PA 13

First player has relatively higher secondaries, but if I were a D.IV team, I would play 3-2 against him. And if I was a D.I team, I wouldn't play 3-2 against second guy.

From: minde

This Post:
00
199504.86 in reply to 199504.85
Date: 11/25/2011 6:34:21 AM
No Good News
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
398398
Second Team:
Backyard Brawlers
So, you say that primary skills for players are those which are on the left column and secondaries on right? I thought that secondaries are, for example, JR for C and RE for guard..

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
199504.87 in reply to 199504.86
Date: 11/25/2011 6:41:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I should explain myself better...yes, secondaries are PA for C and IS for a PG...but secondary abilities are IMO also those who aren't "main" abilities for a certain position; so PG's main abilities are OD and PA and "secondary" HA and DR. Secondary because they are "supportive" skills. I'll make myself clearer next time.

This Post:
00
199504.88 in reply to 199504.83
Date: 11/25/2011 8:21:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
218218
2-3 doesnt work even in league V, thats a fact.
and in lower diviosions players have relatively higher secondaries, like my pf, lowest outside skill is lvl 6, and highest inside skill 12. And in higher divisions ull find lets say outside skills for centers bellow 7, but inside 17-19.

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 11/25/2011 8:23:32 AM

This Post:
22
199504.89 in reply to 199504.83
Date: 11/25/2011 12:14:26 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
To all four posters above me: difference between D.IV and D.I (or even D.II) is HUGE. In D.IV, 3-2 works against Motion and 2-3 works against LI. In D.I or D.II it doesn't most of the time. So while I understand you, you have to understand things are different on higher level of playing because players have more secondaries and teams are more balanced.


Emmm... I'm in D.I and i have won two games using 2-3 zone.
(39682643)
(39682675)

You must understand that not all teams can play a succesfull Zone and so it not all teams can successfully play every offensive.

This Post:
00
199504.90 in reply to 199504.89
Date: 11/25/2011 1:22:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
It's curious, that even if Salyers has a low offensive movement he scored like he wanted.

You only won 2 games?


Show us the games u lost with it.

This Post:
00
199504.91 in reply to 199504.90
Date: 11/25/2011 2:37:47 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
It's my first season in D.I and i have a record 5-1.
2 wins with m2m.
1 win with 3-2 Zone.
2 wins with 2-3 Zone.

From: Tucis

This Post:
11
199504.92 in reply to 199504.11
Date: 11/28/2011 8:08:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
308308
well, I wouldn't say that LI is unbetable by perimeter offence and/or 2-3 defence... check out my last seasons decisive games in Latvian cup. both times win over LI by playing "Princeton" ;)

simply you have to have sutable team/players to play 2-3 zone. and not against all tams playing LI that zone will be effective...

final (38996754)

1/2 final (38984187) against team that dominated the cup for previous 2 seasons...

From: Marot

This Post:
00
199504.93 in reply to 199504.92
Date: 11/28/2011 4:39:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
well, I wouldn't say that LI is unbetable by perimeter offence and/or 2-3 defence... check out my last seasons decisive games in Latvian cup. both times win over LI by playing "Princeton" ;)

simply you have to have sutable team/players to play 2-3 zone. and not against all tams playing LI that zone will be effective...

final (38996754)

1/2 final (38984187) against team that dominated the cup for previous 2 seasons...


(17876)

Hmmm, are you saying USA players aren't good enough to play 2-3?

Astonishing game.



From: Tucis

This Post:
00
199504.94 in reply to 199504.93
Date: 11/28/2011 5:05:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
308308
well, I wouldn't say that LI is unbetable by perimeter offence and/or 2-3 defence... check out my last seasons decisive games in Latvian cup. both times win over LI by playing "Princeton" ;)

simply you have to have suitable team/players to play 2-3 zone. and not against all tams playing LI that zone will be effective...

final (38996754)

1/2 final (38984187) against team that dominated the cup for previous 2 seasons...


(17876)

Hmmm, are you saying USA players aren't good enough to play 2-3?

Astonishing game.




noup. there were 2 parts of that statement...

besides team USA had more TO's, more fouls, thats really part of the game that is not shown in final ratings...



Advertisement