BuzzerBeater Forums

But I don't think it's likely to be a good financial decision in the end compared to competing in the NBBA, cup and potentially B3 for another season.

This is definitely possible. For what it's worth, my plan (and I think im pretty close to 100% with Damena on this) was driven by wanting to rebuild, focus on training and take a break from all the planning it takes to compete. Knowing I'd rake in a bunch of money in the initial 2 seasons was enough to take the big step of tearing down what took years to build. If financial incentive wasn't there it would have been much harder to pull the trigger on this plan.

Thank you for your care of tanking avoid.

you can check my last season.
I have payed about 50'000 player salaries approximately whole season but you see I could win more strongest teams than me only by tactics and strong line-ups! I wanted to be 7th in table for better drafting so I tried to loose my games against weakest teams intentionally by putting just 3 players and "take it easy"!

If I can win by one third of my opponent salary why I cannot save my money?

what if someone wants to pay his money for trainer, PR and medical staff and put 6 trainees in his team and save some money?

I think this PSF cannot avoid tanking as strong as arena income! If it's really about tanking easily can cut a huge amount of arena income of those team which are lo0sing constantly by tanking.
for a tanking team something about $80-150k is not anything, because can earn about $500-600k weekly via arena!

for example I lost my arena income to get better draft (I could be 3rd or 4th) it cannot called tanking, but I know someone in div I who take 7th place that had maximum arena income and minimum salary and finally got nice draft! what about it?


Finally, go0d result is that we may have a more dynamic league and bads are that (1) maybe it's harder for new users to improve their teams and (2) harder to reach those "monsters" of previous rules (make more space between new ones and old ones) and (3) makes game more on salaries and less on tactics

Last edited by MJ at 4/20/2011 4:52:37 PM

I like this change, its a positive move in the right direction.

Its a good first step to limiting the huge gains that can be made by tanking and isn't drastic enough to kill those who are currently using this strategy. I'd rather them start with the floor too low than too high! Now teams know there is going to be a floor and can adjust accordingly.

Good move!

I don't yet understand this "Player Salaries Floor" What happen if you are over it?

Nothing. it's not a cap or a ceiling, so you don't have to worry about being over it.
It's a floor, so you have to worry about being under it. If your players' total salary is less than the floor, you will pay the difference in some sort of tax which you don't benefit from in any way.

Last edited by Thelonious at 4/20/2011 7:52:49 PM

oh ok.. so then I can still get big salary guys as long I can pay them. Good to know, thanks.

They should just call it minimum player salaries lol. You have to have at least that much salary or you will pay that amount anyways.

$230k floor now? That's absolutely ridiculous. If I were to tank, I'd now be losing money over the next 2 seasons. These changes make this game impossible for young teams like me. I have put a hell of a lot of time into my team over my 4-5 seasons and now I can't do anything. I literally can not compete and tanking is a horrible strategy as well.

Yes, I agree. You are screwed because you weren't vocal enough on boards. And if you would you would be called whiner or crybaby. That's how the game is played these days.

How the floor affects you? I am not getting it.. Why cant you compete? Floor is one of the best features so far.