BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Adding D-League option

Adding D-League option

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204205.85 in reply to 204205.79
Date: 1/6/2012 6:34:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I think you've missed the concept of a D-league IN ADDITION to the regular training.

Training should continue as usual, but players that are just not good enough to play at their home team and by that get a little training to do, can do so in the D-league.

I want to remind all a point on my suggestion - Each player can be sent to a D-league before the first game on a training week.

Regarding the randomness training at the D-league, I'm not totally sure about that either.
I like it, because it will create more interesting and variety of players, and each one (at least most) will have some value.

By default - the training on the D-league should be less efficient than the Normal training that is NOT to be removed.

I hope that I've cleared few things out for all.

This Post:
00
204205.86 in reply to 204205.85
Date: 1/6/2012 6:44:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
I understood your suggestion, but your conclusions about upper league teams benefitting less than lower league teams really didn´t make no sense in that context.

D-League is a feature mainly helping the BIG teams, as the small teams can train the rookies without a huge loss in performance, won´t you agree with me on that point?

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
204205.87 in reply to 204205.83
Date: 1/6/2012 6:50:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Huh? That´s a strange conclusion.

You´re basically saying:
In lower leagues, rookies are contributers, therefore the lower leagues need a D-League more than the upper leagues, because when rookies actually can contribute, the need to put them into a D-League is much higher.
Currently, on lower leagues, you need to train less for making a player that cannot contribute just after was drafted to a contributer.

A player that currently had not been good enough for getting training time at his (lower) league and had been fired will be , by this feature, sent to a D-league for a short time and then become a player that can be part of a team's roster, and get a regular decent training-time while back to their team's roster.

Excuse me for not beeing able to follow that path of logic.
Not all can follow logic.
There are some who just can follow suggestions that help themselves.

This Post:
00
204205.88 in reply to 204205.87
Date: 1/6/2012 7:02:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
But this suggestion would HELP me. I think you miss that point. You have to be against it. It helps the team the more the bigger and higher they are.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
204205.89 in reply to 204205.88
Date: 1/6/2012 8:20:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
No it is not. It helps all.

Lower league will finish with D-league training sooner, as they need to bring them to lower level, but all could use and improve using the D-league.

Of course that (as I've already wrote) using the D-league costs money.

Of course that (as I've already wrote) the player salary should be paid.

Of course that (as I've already wrote) it should be added to the feature that will not allow users to sell (or fire) their first draft picks at their first few seasons.