BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Match Viewer Bugs

Match Viewer Bugs (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
1821.86 in reply to 1821.83
Date: 12/4/2007 3:02:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Hello...
I have experienced some really imposible thing... something that seems like a HUGE BUG...
In last scrimmage game (2058162) that I played, my oponent had a roster of only 6 players, and at some point in the game he had his 2 players on the bench, but still had his 4 players on court + imaginary player (there is no name for player, only simbol - )... It can be seen that this "imaginary" player played for 21 min., and had 5 points, 1 foul, 1 TO, and 2 reb... After the game ended I looked for his team stats and saw that his 6 players played for total of 219 min. instead of 240...but in the live game details there are those 6 players with a total of 219 min. but also player with no name that played for that missing 21 min.
And also during the game there was lines like this: " - was called for a shooting foul", or " - scored..." (and that foul or point were added to that 7th (imaginary) player)
So it seams that no team can play with only 4 players on court...game automaticaly adds a imaginary player...
This is a BIG BUG...


It's actually not a bug at all.

The team had 6 players, 2 of of which had 6 personal fouls, so they couldn't play on. Therefore only 4 players remained. In this situation, someone from the crowd is put into the game, the so called "lucky fan". The only bug is that the name didn't show in the viewer, not the fact that he played.




This Post:
00
1821.87 in reply to 1821.85
Date: 12/4/2007 3:02:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
I understand that, but I was not referring to team sum...
I was refering to the sum of points for all his players that played this game... And I copy/paste data from box score, and bolded scored points for every player , and then added all together...

Muljavci MIN FG 3FG FT OR TR AST TO STL BLK PF PTS Rating
Nitz, Yvan 48 12 - 18 1 - 4 0 - 0 1 17 10 0 3 0 3 25 5.0
Svitlica, Jasmin 37 8 - 18 1 - 3 4 - 5 0 7 4 5 1 2 3 21 5.0
Dlugoborski, Igor 48 4 - 8 0 - 1 12 - 12 0 7 4 1 0 0 2 20 3.0
Šakotic, Hamzalija 27 7 - 14 4 - 9 0 - 3 0 0 6 2 2 0 6 18 6.5
Beštija, Anto 46 5 - 14 0 - 3 3 - 6 1 5 1 0 1 0 1 13 4.0
Longoni, Gaetano 13 0 - 2 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 6 0 4.5
Muljavci 38 - 79 7 - 22 19 - 28 3 43 27 9 7 2 22 102

The total sum (points) for his team does not match the sum (points) of his players (individualy)...

25 + 21+ 20 + 18 + 13 + 0 = 97 (not 102) / because row PTS represent total points, regardles if for 2 or 3 points...
And the difference is that 5 points, that I am reffering as made by imaginary player...

This Post:
00
1821.88 in reply to 1821.86
Date: 12/4/2007 3:34:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
Ok...
Its clear now...
I just was not aware someone from the crowd is put into the game if there is no player to fill in for the fouled-out (or injured) player...
But actually, the box score does not show that situation... that was the confusing element here...

This Post:
00
1821.89 in reply to 1821.88
Date: 12/5/2007 12:30:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55

I am watching the match live on my computer and after the first quarter jump directly to the extra time ......
As I mark remaining 45 minutes and a little more but this accounting items and everything as if it were an extra time

This Post:
00
1821.90 in reply to 1821.1
Date: 12/5/2007 4:45:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
In game (1004754) with 0:45 remaining in 3Q, my player missed a FT but no rebound was reported. The shot clock started counting down for the other team, but then my player from my team took a shot with about 0:24 remaining.

This Post:
00
1821.91 in reply to 1821.1
Date: 12/5/2007 4:32:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
Any chance we could get an update of the first post here?

This Post:
00
1821.92 in reply to 1821.91
Date: 12/6/2007 3:06:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Any chance we could get an update of the first post here?


AFAIK, as of now everything is fixed.
Even Jimrtex's most recent bug.

Anything from now is new.


From: BB-Oxidus

This Post:
00
1821.96 in reply to 1821.93
Date: 12/6/2007 3:33:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
then why don't you update the first post? ;)



Because I'm a lazy, good for nothing waster :-)

I've updated it ..

Advertisement