BuzzerBeater Forums

Your probably right. I also figure that in the NBBA, everybody scouts, and the first round will have all the good players, while in my Div V draft, not much scouting means there will be good players drafted late.

I really don't think anything is rigged, I just thought they might give better picks to higher leagues, but after further review i think you get lucky (or unlucky) in any division.

My draft:
(8171779)

Weekly salary: $ 7 096
DMI: 0
Age: 18
Height: 6'10" / 208 cm
Potential: perennial allstar
Game Shape: respectable

Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: average
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: respectable
Driving: awful Passing: atrocious
Inside Shot: respectable Inside Def.: respectable
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: inept Free Throw: strong

Experience: pitiful


40.000 every week.

:)

VERY nice.

NT player at your hands. And you actually can choose a PF or a SF.

I envy you, cause i spent the same 40k and got myself 3 water boys even though they were 5star,18y, a+.

This is a PF. He's 6'10 and has no passing ability.

Your probably right. I also figure that in the NBBA, everybody scouts, and the first round will have all the good players, while in my Div V draft, not much scouting means there will be good players drafted late.

I really don't think anything is rigged, I just thought they might give better picks to higher leagues, but after further review i think you get lucky (or unlucky) in any division.

Definitely not true. I'm living proof. :)

i think there are already some people saying that the player thet drafted was scouted to have 5 balls on star ratings

and you would be shock to get a bad mix of skill not mentioning what is their skill level.

seems pretty interesting our draft is!

Was your response meant for me? I don't really understand what you're saying or what the connection is.

Guys give a look on that draft(and watch all the players of that draft):
/BBWeb/draftSummary.aspx?season=7&leagueid=1012
logical? fairly hallucinatory..

someone noticed a better draft ?

Last edited by Edju at 2/25/2009 7:54:26 PM

I gathered in order all the most potentials of that draft and there are more potentials of allstar and star with very nice salary..

most of them are 18 yo..
here are them:


Weekly salary: $ 4 423
Age: 18
Potential: allstar

Weekly salary: $ 3 327
Age: 18
Potential: perennial allstar

Weekly salary: $ 4 406
Age: 19
Potential: hall of famer

Weekly salary: $ 3 848
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

Weekly salary: $ 5 043
Age: 19
Potential: hall of famer

Weekly salary: $ 3 606
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

Weekly salary: $ 5 085
Age: 18
Potential: MVP

Weekly salary: $ 5 427
Age: 19
Potential: allstar

Weekly salary: $ 4 585
Age: 19
Potential: MVP

Weekly salary: $ 4 381
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

Weekly salary: $ 3 014
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

Weekly salary: $ 4 498
Age: 18
Potential: allstar

Weekly salary: $ 5 150
Age: 18
Potential: perennial allstar

Weekly salary: $ 4 354
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

Weekly salary: $ 3 201
Age: 18
Potential: superstar

i just want to ask everybody

should we independently decide on a draft pick not basing on both star and potential rating,

what i meant is, if everyone agrees with me that a 5 star 5 potential guy is such a rare thing in a draft probably 1-2 or even none on every draft. but when you get him your astounded that yes his a hall of famer or a mvp but the skill sets he has aint that gonna make you wow or even say damn! this guy needs a lot of work when i see a lot of work i do mean a lot of work not just a few weeks of training to get him to proficent to get started or worst getting to respectable.

should i see no correlation to what a player is even having a 5 star and 5 potential guy, than the understanding a 5 star guy is still random that at times you can see bad skills combo with good skill level as what a 5 potential is just how far you can train the guy.

i think basing it on how you got your picks, its not always good some who got 5 and 4 wound up to have better players than the 5 and 5

hope you guys understand me,

because if its a rare gem, let it be a rare gem.

as much as we want to make this game close to reality, there is a thick line that seperates reality and a game.

as i would say, basketball team or like the nba teams dont just pick draft completely out of talent but what the teams need, an example is andrea bargnani, this guy shouldnt be a first pick but because toronto see him as a perfect fit for the team they pick him up. or another is oden.

true not all picks that are drafted top 3 are the best or can play at a top level like others but they are mainly pick due to their potential to be able to dominate, like darko, kwame brown, adam morrison etc etc ect

but this is a game, wouldnt it be that when you see and 5 star 5 potential guy its like a rare gem, i do believe that 90% of the time when your arranging your picks you would put the 5 star 5 potential guy on the very top of your choice.

if this is a bad indication then we can just ignore the fact that whatever the scout says, its all random and its all luck.

because a 5 star and 5 potential guy doesnt mean anything to even say this player is good to be a rare thing after all,

Last edited by Shoei at 2/25/2009 8:47:20 PM