BuzzerBeater Forums

Look then other things play a factor then he got 20+ shots. you can figure out why he didn't score like manon said the od and double team was working. Just because that player had handling 15 with driving , dont mean he will be good in patient( meaning you didn't have the other components in patient to make it work).. My pf dont have handling 15 nor driving 15, but mines is looking better than yours in patient because I have team to make it work in his favor.

You can claim lack of comp. Look the other team that beat me center/pf were way better he still got a double double. So again you don't have the team to play it. What was ft shooting at?? he didn't get to the line. he didnt create any shot ,if he did the defense really made his day hell.


You cant mad at me because, Im tying to tell how its played. pf/centers don't shoot lot of 3ptrs again foolish on your behalf> you expected the center/pf to be raining and bombing 3's . comical at best, if its the best shot on the floor then he will take it, your didn't make them., he had skill for the mis-match. he got his chances, he just got shut down or had a bad night.. But Thank you for the laugh, its good with the coffee this morning.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 4/17/2014 11:38:39 AM

...

If you want to talk about this, take it to a new thread in the help forum (or to BB-Mail). I'm done with this here.

If by 24 hours you mean 6 weeks :P...

Of course this was locked when I went to post in "...4" But if you insist...

(69104941)

Okay, I expected to lose prior to the game, but given the lineups and ratings... is this really the report of a 21 point loss at home?

So the overall ratings are incapable of correctly weighing participation? That's disappointing. What I mean is, if the teams ratings were (picking easy numbers) 10 for 36 minutes, and 5 for 12 minutes. The overall ratings shouldn't be 5, 6, or even 7.5... they should be 8.75. And in a game as lopsided as 21 points... that 8.75 should be higher than my teams overall ratings. I know the ratings are only guidelines, but these guidelines seem to have no bearing on reality.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/69104969/boxscore.aspx)

I'm upset. Yes I did not have my star PG with awesome passing and defense in the game, but god damn, how do i lose when i guess the tactics exactly right?

yes ratings look horrible, but it's the french patient strategy (i always expect poor ratings)

I felt the GDP and my enth will at least get me the victory, now instead I'm gonna be in a 3 game skid cuz I play 2 very tough opponents next week. only chance i got of winning those is if CT.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/69104969/boxscore.aspx)

I'm upset. Yes I did not have my star PG with awesome passing and defense in the game, but god damn, how do i lose when i guess the tactics exactly right?

yes ratings look horrible, but it's the french patient strategy (i always expect poor ratings)

I felt the GDP and my enth will at least get me the victory, now instead I'm gonna be in a 3 game skid cuz I play 2 very tough opponents next week. only chance i got of winning those is if CT.

If you look at the PP100, there is not one position where your team should have expected to outscore your opponent's position. Combine that with foul differential (which is unsurprising when you're on the road, using less effort and playing patient) and things unfold as they did.