BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > "Don't train" option

"Don't train" option

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
131961.9 in reply to 131961.8
Date: 2/18/2010 3:01:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Another solution to this problem might be to change the training system. Make it so that you can train any skill in any position. So you could train Passing in C. Or you could train Rebounding for just C. Or something like that.


i wouldn't like that, this will make it to easy in my eyes ;) And if you screw up games to make it the hard way(especially SF trainers), and now everybody could come and make such players easily.

This Post:
00
131961.10 in reply to 131961.9
Date: 2/18/2010 3:02:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Okay, well what about simply making every training choice have at least a single position training option?
So Rebounding would have the choice of just training C.

This Post:
00
131961.11 in reply to 131961.10
Date: 2/18/2010 3:35:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Training overhauls have been proposed many times. It's ment to be a challenge to train multiskilled players. There is a significant improvement already for training someone out of position, as you choose which position he guards.
Only solution I see in this case is: get a player with potential that caps out at that skill level, to keep him near that salary. Basically you want to make money by training young players without adding extra wage to your main squad (as you can't keep that trainee anyway, he also demands more money next season).

This Post:
00
131961.12 in reply to 131961.11
Date: 2/19/2010 9:23:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Well, it's too much discussion for nothing. I don't know many teams that don't want to train their players. It's a problem that occured to your team my friend and you have to find a way to solve it... I wish you to find a way with the current system.

This Post:
00
131961.13 in reply to 131961.1
Date: 2/19/2010 10:29:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
I get your point, and while this may only affect few teams (being yours one of the affected), I guess this discussion will come up again sometime soon because as the game keeps going on, more will be the teams affected by the same issue.

I don't think that they will implement something like that because this issue is the exception, not the rule. Although, I'd like to suggest something, if I may: you can always keep your trainees, train your starters too, and then replace them in the beggining of the new season for new ones with salary within the range you can afford. This way, you get to have even better starters as the season goes on, and you just have a little downgrade in the beggining of the new one (although that downgrade is only going to put you where you want to be with this "Don't train" system). You still get to keep the profit of that replacement.

Just a thought ;)

EDIT: I just realized we could easily be talking in portuguese, but rules are rules :p

Last edited by AfonsoP at 2/19/2010 10:30:03 AM

This Post:
00
131961.14 in reply to 131961.13
Date: 2/19/2010 12:22:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
I get your point, and while this may only affect few teams (being yours one of the affected), I guess this discussion will come up again sometime soon because as the game keeps going on, more will be the teams affected by the same issue.


I agree completely.


I don't think that they will implement something like that because this issue is the exception, not the rule. Although, I'd like to suggest something, if I may: you can always keep your trainees, train your starters too, and then replace them in the beggining of the new season for new ones with salary within the range you can afford. This way, you get to have even better starters as the season goes on, and you just have a little downgrade in the beggining of the new one (although that downgrade is only going to put you where you want to be with this "Don't train" system). You still get to keep the profit of that replacement.

Just a thought ;)

EDIT: I just realized we could easily be talking in portuguese, but rules are rules :p


Today is the exception, in the near future it will be the reality of many teams. Anyway, of course I'll try to adapt to the current system, I'll start training SFs and PFs and sell/buy players at the beginning of the future seasons. I'd just prefer to keep my players on my roster for more time, sometimes you get attached to them and don't want to look at them as totally disposable assets.
Abraço

This Post:
00
131961.15 in reply to 131961.14
Date: 2/19/2010 1:11:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Today is the exception, in the near future it will be the reality of many teams. Anyway, of course I'll try to adapt to the current system, I'll start training SFs and PFs and sell/buy players at the beginning of the future seasons. I'd just prefer to keep my players on my roster for more time, sometimes you get attached to them and don't want to look at them as totally disposable assets.


I agree completely. Actually, I really like some of my players and wouldn't be happy if I had to get rid of them just because of the wages.

Another thing you can do is to switch player between games in order to try never giving them full training.

Abraço tambem :)

This Post:
00
131961.16 in reply to 131961.15
Date: 2/19/2010 3:57:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
You can sell your tarinees and train FT and Stamina. This way your team will be complete... Every season sell all your picks and earn money from them. It's not the most profitable way but you get what you want...

This Post:
00
131961.17 in reply to 131961.16
Date: 2/19/2010 4:36:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
You can sell your tarinees and train FT and Stamina. This way your team will be complete... Every season sell all your picks and earn money from them. It's not the most profitable way but you get what you want...


so you loose something around 40% of fun that you can get playing BB....


Totally agreed with Idea about "stop training" feature.

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
131961.18 in reply to 131961.17
Date: 2/19/2010 5:26:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
It's a possible solution, though. He does whatever he likes, I am nothing more than anoter user who gives his opinion to his problem. I don't refer the word ''must'' in my previous sentence.

This Post:
00
131961.19 in reply to 131961.18
Date: 2/19/2010 6:04:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I think it should make the game more difficult for who starting from an inferiority situation.I think that the actual system is a choice of the developers to force the teams however to change always something,because a team could reach the top level and then stop there for many seasons with the same players.Also if sometimes it creates some tough questions,this is one of the point most interesting of the game

Advertisement