I would NEVER have made any complaint on ANY price if it had been the result of a fair bidding process. The initial price of the player on the market has nothing to do with that. I chose to put him on the market on a low price because I wanted to sell him EXPECTING a FAIR market bidding process. That is not against the rules of the game, I did not violate any rules, the problem is that I was treated differently from others. Others at this moment have, and at any time in the past had the access to an unaffected market, I did not.
You're missing Mark's point. Part of the expectation when you put your player on the market is that technology may fail. Therefore, when you're listing anyone below the price you expect to get, you're doing this at your own risk.
Granted, the BB team does all possible to prevent unexpected failure, but it will still happen occasionally. BB does not have a policy of handing out compensation, but transfer deadlines have been extended, when possible. In this particular case, it wasn't possible. While the situation is unfortunate, it's part of the reality of online games.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."