BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Single player training

Single player training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
162827.9 in reply to 162827.1
Date: 11/6/2010 2:33:35 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
I'm not for your idea, because I can't imagine who would use it unless the training is quicker than usual single position training. Even for farm teams training for NT's it's not needed as they don't care about playing out of position. But I agree training bigmen at PG to get passing or outside def. training is boring. I personally use such a trainings quite often, but in my eyes there has been still very few teams which has been able to adapt well at present training rules even with changing positions for defence. As a NT manager I can say it's always very difficult to persuade managers for out of position trainings. I would suggest some new training options like every single trainings available on SF, this should be probably acceptable to use for much more teams than using present out of position trainings.

This Post:
00
162827.10 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:46:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
SF demands lowest wage (compared with others), therefore I think that this position have to be hardest to get.

From: Cydius

This Post:
11
162827.11 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:41:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Every position should have single training available with limitation like PG can't have inside skill single training.

SG - SF should have single training for OD PA etc...
PG - SF should have single training for JR
PF - SF should have single training for IS ID
PF should have single training for Block
etc

If you look at the training system a SF trainee has to play anything but SF to progress in single training, PF too . it makes no sense.

You want to train your SG ? he should play SG, you want your C to have some SG skill ? he should play SG.


This Post:
00
162827.12 in reply to 162827.11
Date: 11/7/2010 4:34:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
What makes no sense is to single position training. Basketball is a team game. It makes perfect sense that when you want to train your PF inside, your C gets training too.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
162827.13 in reply to 162827.11
Date: 11/7/2010 4:37:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
If you look at the training system a SF trainee has to play anything but SF to progress in single training, PF too .
You can train your SF and still play him as an SF. It's called multiple position training.
You want to train your SG ? he should play SG, you want your C to have some SG skill ? he should play SG.

Easy: Multiple position training.




Multiple position training.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
162827.14 in reply to 162827.13
Date: 11/7/2010 5:34:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
tips : single > multiple > team

If you have to use a less efficient training then there is a little problem with the system :)

This Post:
33
162827.15 in reply to 162827.14
Date: 11/7/2010 6:16:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
The system is fine. You shouldn't be able to use the most efficient training without paying a price.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
162827.16 in reply to 162827.10
Date: 11/8/2010 6:05:49 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
It would be still hardest, because of height these players trains outskills slower than guards and inside skills slower than bigmen.

This Post:
00
162827.17 in reply to 162827.15
Date: 11/8/2010 6:09:08 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11991199
Second Team:
Jirkov
You are already paying the price, because speed of single position trainings is not double of double position trainings. Nowadays who want to make really top player can use single position training.
Your idea look more like delete single position at all. Why not ... but if there are single position trainings they could be more ballanced between positions.