I keep thinking that ending up in 5th with $300k cannot be understood as bad management compared to ending in 6th or 7th with $0 to $100k, even thought the teams that end in 6/7th place can start the next season with better economical balance.
For many teams figthing for 4th is much worse than just loose matchs on purpose to end in 6/7th. Sometimes even ending in 4th and making an additional playoff match is worse than ending in 6/7th and making 2 or 3 more games.
I think that salaries should be cut to 50%, or something like this, when teams do not have official matchs.
This is just my 2 cents.
Last edited by valetept at 12/15/2010 11:17:14 AM