BuzzerBeater Forums

Still, most of the players will end up beeing fired because of their initial skillset, but it would be nice to have like 20% of the players drafted around for some time. Won´t happen with the current system, and for sure not in higher league (happy celebrating your 4th and 5th league comparison, but that´s not a valid point for the discussion, because anybody´s aim should be to compete in a higher league AND because I do by no means ask for a higher skill level of the original draftees, so the impact rookies will have stays the same at the beginning of their career).

but a lot of player get stopped anyway before reaching allstar potential, and when you get your upper league player when you are still in lower league you often also loose your money. And i saw a lot of stars whoo could be still backup for my team.

Also i beleive the main reason for just using the top 5 per cent of draftee is, that we simple doesn't need more. We had to face, that we nearly don't loose player, when a team goes bot most trained player stayed a lived and the new team produce some talent too, before they reach the point where they could use the old talents.

And most upper division teams train, and also sacrifice a lot for training like the low leagues dudes ok they ain't 18 year old anymore but it is still training.

Edit: I miss all the threads, with there a no players worth to train out there, from people who are looking for trainees. Only think i see is that people want draft where they could train or sell 2-3 of them ... But the market already is filled, with players who fit in your criterias that you get one of them easily if you like.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/8/2011 1:59:23 AM

The problem is not that you can't buy a player to train who is good enough for your team. I could do that for less than one weeks scouting cost easily. Even restricting myself to just Australia (600 managers) I have little difficulty in finding great trainees. The issue is that it is almost impossible to draft one yourself. Bumping a ton of players potential from roleplayer or 6th man to allstar or pallstar probably wont make trainees even cheaper, they are already almost free at that potential level unless they have very high starting skills and are aged 18, but it will make it possible for people to train their own draft picks.

I have spent $20,000 a week every single week since I started early in season 10 and yet I still have all three of my trainees bought from other teams.

but this wouldn't be different through raising the quality in the draft, this would be more making the player more the same. So that you keep him or fire him, cause the other most likely don't want to buy cause they have the same.

With higher quality, the player you keep to train get better, but most of your self drafted dudes will be still to weak considering the circumstances.

And getting an ideal trainee through draft is complicated, cause he had to fit in your programm to so even when you find a solid one you often sell him cause he don't fit into your training plan since you maybe had to fight other weaknesses then with your trainees. Maybe there more details about the draft could help.

Once you were relegating from divII. You were drafting 4-th. Drafted a pretty good guy, but sold him for 1mil. Why did you not train him? You expect to keep drafting the best guy, even if you are one of the strongest teams in the league?

Actually I have drafted some brilliant players and could field a solid team from my ex-draft picks but the problem is that they have mostly been very unsuitable for me to train. From my early days I was committed to training SGs so while the money was great from drafting and selling brilliant 6'9"and 6'7" players keeping and training them wasn't really an option for me.

Training SFs is a cruel and thankless task, after being trained every week for five seasons here is that draft pick.

Peni Lucas (14843945)
Point Guard
Owner: Yarra Park Bears
Weekly salary: $ 17 613
Age: 23
Height: 6'7" / 201 cm
Potential: superstar

Nope I don't expect to keep on drafting the best guy but I would hope to draft someone great for me to train at some stage.

I laughed when i read this

This is a point where I somehow agree with Pin

*sorry Pini*

yer look, i think its a good thinking outside the square kind of idea. so you get a ball for that. But i think its trying to use a sledge hammer to crack a walnut.

I do kind of like the idea of hiding potential, but then that would TOTALLY stuff up the transfer market.
I know people whinge about low potential players. But i was just recently bidding on a guy with 6th-man potential. OK so im in Div III but im 10-0 and my starting SF is injured. point being is that a) Somebody trained this guy and b) i was prepared to buy him.
Ironically, so was someone else, because they outbid me.

fact is ive used star and starter potential players in the past, because there is no pressure to constantly train them. They have reached their cap, so now they become the player that i dont care about training minutes for.

So, what im saying is, is that i feel that there actually is a valid place for these kinds of potential players.
yoda hit the nail on the head with the dispersion stats. I actually think the problem is the salary of the players. why have a 19 year old MVP PF with atrocious rebounding. its just not cricket.

anyways, good ideas, but too much change for me. think smaller :)

If he's been training him for 5 seasons, then obviously he is doing something wrong.
So you chose not to train your great draftees. I rest my case...

He was a great draftee but at 6'7" with more inside skills than outside he wasn't for me training SGs. Do you really win this case just because I don't totally change my entire team around get rid of all my old big guys and replace them with young ones and stop training all my established guards just because I draft someone great but totally unsuitable for my current plans?

In another season I drafted a brilliant high $ player who was perfect except for the minor fact that he was a 6'6" PG with atrocious JS. Should I have spent an entire season training JS just to get him to the starting line by age 19 and then watch him train very slowly ever after?

Last edited by yodabig at 12/8/2011 8:27:47 AM

Who cares about winning the case? I just don't see the point on dragging this any longer. I understand now that you want the perfect trainee, whenever it suits you. You have drafted some great trainees and chose not to train them.

totally change my entire team around get rid of all my old big guys and replace them with young ones and stop training all my established guards just because I draft someone great but totally unsuitable for my current plans?

Yes, if you want to train your own trainee, it means you have to get rid of the old training plan and suit your own draftees needs.

i really like these kind of ideas coming forwards. Quite a few points have been raised against the ideas here but i think there is a lot of concern about new players and how the transfer market will be affected and other such things, which i dont think is really founded on any logic or evidence - and when i look through it, it just boils down to established managers and teams not wanting to change and adapt to new ideas - whether these ideas are truly better or not!

I think more elements of randomness would be good. More hidden abilities /less transparent views of players skills until time/money has been spent to identify them / different rates of training etc - all good stuff in my opinion.

these hidden skills could be described or explained by personality or physical traits. whether they affect the speed of training, or provide a modifier to one or more skills in a game, or to your team as a whole, or in certain situations... the possibilities are endless and exciting with imagination.

some ideas to illustrate what i mean:
Ambidextrous - would mean a player gets some bonuses to his skills like passing and shooting around the basket.
Athletic - bonuses to rebounding
Flair - the fans love the player and buy more merchandise, may be susceptible to more turnovers/missed shots
Quick learner - small bonus to training speed (could be subdivided into certain skills)
Agile (feet) - lower % chance of travelling, bonus to defence, particularly ID
Agile (hands) - lower % chance of turnover, bonus to defence, particularly OD
Leader - when on the court bonus to teams skill checks in the game when the team is down by >10 points

or a dude with high JS and JR is a good three point shooter

a dude with high handling and passing makes few to

a dude with high driving travels less

such thing like flair and leader might be implemented but please nothing which is also reflected in skills, also it should have disadvantages too. Cause when they got skill bonus without getting paid for, it is weird and making specialities necessary to some builds, besides starting skill won't help much too.

And it is not only fight against change at all, cause you shouldn't change just for the change in my eyes you should do it for improve. I don't like such argument, who just attack the other side.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/9/2011 4:56:48 AM