BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Idea for Rookies

Idea for Rookies

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
251291.9 in reply to 251291.7
Date: 12/6/2013 9:40:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
116116
I've always liked the idea of older draftees having higher potential starting skills. 18yo max is respectable. Maybe 19 is strong, 20/21 is proficient. 22 is prominent. The age/max skill level ratio would have to be analyzed a bit to ensure balance. And I especially love the older the draftee, the lower the potential.

This would also help make the draft more productive for the top 1-6 teams. As it currently stands, it's highly unlikely to get a worthwhile draftee if you're one of the last picks. And that's not too realistic. I'm real life, you're not likely to get a franchise player, but you are likely to be able to draft a backup.

This Post:
00
251291.11 in reply to 251291.10
Date: 12/15/2013 7:11:19 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
I think 18 yr old draft picks are fine as is.(Highest skill being 7). But I think that 19yr old draft picks should be able to have some strongs. If this were the case, people wouldn't be firing their 19yr old draft picks. I drafted a 19 yr old HOF and I kept him, because he is a HOF and he is from a small country. He is only 5 or 6 pops behind some of the other 21yr olds that started to get trained from 18.
I am the U-21 coach and I see it every season....people are firing everything 19 that has less than superstar potential.
Even if it could be 5 strongs max for a 19 yr old, that would change some peoples minds about tossing their 19 yr old draft pick in the trash.

This Post:
00
251291.12 in reply to 251291.11
Date: 12/17/2013 7:11:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
297297
Even with strongs they would like be inferior to 18 year olds. Especially big men. Throw in a proficient or 2 and you might have a guy that can keep up for U-21 teams