BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > How can i lower the amount of faults?

How can i lower the amount of faults?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Mr. Glass

This Post:
00
261409.9 in reply to 261409.8
Date: 7/20/2014 11:25:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Isn't Sb part of inside defense.. I alwys looked at it as. high shot block with good Id = a good shot blocker. but high Sb with Bad Id = foul prone. Same to be said for a guard. Thats how I see I sometimes..

This Post:
11
261409.11 in reply to 261409.9
Date: 7/21/2014 9:20:56 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
13831383
No it's the other way around; a player with High ID but low SB will still try to block shots but since he's bad at it he'll foul a lot more. Maybe a player with low ID and high SB will also foul a lot because of bad defense in general, but in general it's a good thing to train SB if you want to decrease fouls on your big.

This Post:
00
261409.12 in reply to 261409.11
Date: 7/21/2014 1:50:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Thank you for the clear up..

@Manon well I always that there were the two dominate defense bases. id/od , sb wouldnt matter much in the ge.

From: Mr. Glass

This Post:
00
261409.14 in reply to 261409.13
Date: 7/21/2014 2:04:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
That makes a lot of sense.


on a personal perspective.
I think getting sb 14 or higher is too expensive. unless you neglect the other skill of the player.

Something like some teams do with look inside players, I understand it easier to create a big man than a guard or something like that. But Not many players with above 14 sb and 15 ID on the market or in the game I assume. I Think its problematic in a way, I think in order for it to work or e effective you'll need a strong defense tactic. The strongest one is man2man which is 50/50 with much errors. The rest to many error.

3-2 and m2m are he safest bet for blocks. I saw a few team playing Base O/2-3 one and winning games versus a stronger oppenent. what your thought on that

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 7/21/2014 2:08:03 PM

From: Mr. Glass

This Post:
00
261409.16 in reply to 261409.15
Date: 7/21/2014 2:41:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I got beat pretty badly playing 2-3 as well. I really don't why I think there some hope for it. I think it should change to 2-3 m2m which is a differ for of it.. 2-3 zone is a just sure lost

I agree with 3-2 zone. Its just better and safer gamble.

This Post:
11
261409.18 in reply to 261409.14
Date: 7/21/2014 4:35:58 PM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
13831383
Yeah if you just add 7 SB to the same C of course it will be expensive. You have to make decisions; for example I like to have a defensive C with low IS (about 4 levels below the other inside skills) but high SB and good passing. That way his salary is still managable, he's a great defender and can still score off assists and putbacks and pass when he doesn't have a good shot.

This Post:
00
261409.19 in reply to 261409.18
Date: 7/21/2014 9:58:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I have on of those on my team. a space taker , I just use him for size and space on the floor,

Advertisement