BuzzerBeater Forums

I didn't suggested adding something usless you just don't appreciate the sponcer idea as something improving but i'm playing in maneging games since 95 and belive me in every game that had it-it gave a lot of fun and an edge on other games,just emagine yourseld prepring for the next game that in 50+ hours and you don't have nothing else to do untill then and having the option to sell commercial boreds to sponcers at the stedium isn't that something that will add for the game? having an option to add and upgrade your own Merchandise club shop that will increase your income from Merchandise? why only improving the number of seats in your stedium when you can build a whole city in it? where are the food stands? how many bathrooms are in the stedium? there is a whole world of improvments in this and you just need to be open about it and accept the fact it really worth the hard work of programing and doing it

It's clearly opinion, not fact.

I don't see this as adding value to the game, but rather over-complicating things, especially for newer users.

Another great idea-selling your stedium name rights for a sponcer and getting money for it(i seen it in another merchandise forum)like "BB arena" and so (:

And the BB's admins can sell for real sponcer the option to gice the site money for the option to be an officel BB sponcer in the game,like for each "**** arena" in the game the sponcer **** will give the BB site 50 cent.

I'm sure this could benefit both game users and game developers.

Ok i agree it will be comlicated for new users but we can do that the smart way like giving the option to choose to handle this things youself or giving the PR-manger to do it for you while you handle the games and players only.

That will solve all the things and when a new player learn enough he can open these new game options if he wants or just stay as he was.

Respond from anyone? (:
other pepole said it's a good idea they would like to see becoimg a reality and i'm too if amyone has something to say write it here.

the point we are raising for sponsors is to be able to increase our team's revenue.

but you study it clearly how bb ecomony is then i would say there is no need for such thing,

its already a given fact that as its already a known fact that the teams that are powerful will be more powerful since it would be easy for them to accomplish whatever task demanded by the sponsors so you can have money or simply being able to recieve more.

the challenge of this game is to build your team in a way you can compete as well as to be able to handle your team finances.

remember the more power you have, the more responsibility you will have.

Respond from anyone? (:
other pepole said it's a good idea they would like to see becoimg a reality and i'm too if amyone has something to say write it here.

I think that the system is fine as it is and that this is an unnecessary addition.

Do not bump threads.

bump threads? pls explain

I think it would be better if you were payed by the week and the teams that played best that week get the most money for sponsors and it still has to do with games, but all teams have a fair chance at making money.

If you win games more people come to your arena. Pointless to make it by week anyway because you might have 2 outsiders one week and 2 top notch teams next week in the long run it is still decided then as a seasonal money + strong teams play better and get more money = same with arena no need for additional source of cash...

I support that idea. Sponsors, yes. But not only stupid random "you've signed a 10k/month sponsor contract" each season. Create numbers of names (real or fantasy, doesn't matter) for sponsors and let managares choose offers. F.E. McDonalds offers 2-year contract for 50k for season but there are 3 better offers and the manager can make a decision of his own. Moreover, because of the fact that sponsors would polarize even further distinctions between financial status of higher and lower league teams, it would be good to add to the sponsors' offers some restrictions. Company X gives you Y amount of money this year, but they expect you to achieve goal Z this season. The higher league, the bigger expectations from sponsors - it's totally understood, beacuse more money given to bigger clubs put sponsors in position to make strict requirements. Not fulfilling the conditions of contract can effect even in turning down the contract and again - the higher league, the more violent and serious sponsor decisions.

That's definitely a great idea and just must be put into the game, because without that BB won't be even "quite" realistic game. I'm astonished reading your 'i don't like it' opinions. When a useful and realistic thing is a 'no, no", explain how the heck you accepted the idea of every week salary raise for staff. How it is suppose to play with the reality? Payment raising every week. Some kind of Eden or something. Lol.