BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > taking advantage of the mismatch.

taking advantage of the mismatch.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: ringo™

This Post:
00
31707.91 in reply to 31707.90
Date: 5/26/2008 4:15:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Italy Top League (so far):

7'2" / 7'0" / 6'10" / 6'10" / 6'5" / 6'11" / 6'9" / 6'11" / 6'9" / 6'10"

From: Tivoli
This Post:
00
31707.92 in reply to 31707.91
Date: 5/27/2008 9:40:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Don´t forget Dennis Rodman 6'8 or somehtin like that. One of the best rebounders in NBA history maybe.

This Post:
00
31707.93 in reply to 31707.84
Date: 5/28/2008 6:21:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
The longer the game evolves, the better the height factor in training will be visible. Almost all the best centers in BB will be big guys.
Sure, there will be some smaller players who 'll have a great rebounding stat, but they won't reach the ultimate BB-top in the long run.
A bit of patience and you should be fine.


It was long to get to here... really long thread.

What Kantine says is the key, the game is still too young so we can find many strange things such as a NT player on a IV division. With time all this players will become unaffordable for low divisions teams due to their salaries.

The same with height. The way it affects to the training is the way BB has chosen to simulate the reality. When the game become older, most of the centers playing in the first divisions will be tall, and probably very few small players will be able to compete with them for rebound.

Of course it could be changed, but any other way to simulate the height effect will also have side-effects. In this games you have to simulate the reality with only a few parameters, therefore it will never be perfect.

But saying "it should be changed" does not help at all, because we all agree with that. Question is how to do it.

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
This Post:
00
31707.94 in reply to 31707.93
Date: 5/28/2008 8:25:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
But saying "it should be changed" does not help at all, because we all agree with that.


That's not accurate in the least.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
31707.95 in reply to 31707.94
Date: 5/28/2008 8:47:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I meant that we all want to improve the game, make it more realistic but at the same time easy to play... that's easy to say but hard to do.

If there were an easy way to introduce the height effect in a more realistic way than it is, without making the game much harder, I´m pretty sure they would try it.

Anyway, I'm quite confortable with the current system because I´m not looking for the perfect basket simulator.

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
This Post:
00
31707.96 in reply to 31707.95
Date: 5/28/2008 9:40:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
If there were an easy way to introduce the height effect in a more realistic way than it is, without making the game much harder, I´m pretty sure they would try it.


The height system is in fact pretty realistic.
A smaller guy is able to rebound as good as a taller one, he just has to work harder for it, which is reflected in BB in training.
Just in the top leagues, he won't be able to compete with the big guys who work as hard as he does. And this will be more and more reflected in the coming seasons.

The only thing imo could be done to create a height mismatch, is condition:
- a small guy playing down could have a slight penalty on condition (has to jump relatively higher than his big opponent with the same rebounding level, which forces him to use more energy)
- a big guy playing a small guy outside has to run/turn more which he is physically less adapted for, so he also loses a bit more condition.

This system should be a compromise for the people that keep on going about the mismatch, although personally I think it's fine as it is.

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.
This Post:
00
31707.97 in reply to 31707.96
Date: 5/28/2008 10:05:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I also think that the current system is quite good, and of course your suggestions are also OK.

But when I prepare a match, I check my adversary's players. I check their statistics and ratings, their form and the position where they usually play. I try to find the weak and strong points of him. But at any moment, I check the height of the players because the height is only affecting to the owner of the player in terms of training speed.

In my opinion, in real basket, a coach will always take into account the height of the other players. Because there is an intrinsic physical advantage on it which is not depending on the training. That's what I try to mean when I say that this could be improved.

A second improvement related to this, will give more importance to the blocking skill of centers, which should be able to block shots of every player trying to get into the zone (not only his positional partner).

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
This Post:
00
31707.98 in reply to 31707.97
Date: 5/28/2008 10:21:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
In my opinion, in real basket, a coach will always take into account the height of the other players. Because there is an intrinsic physical advantage on it which is not depending on the training. That's what I try to mean when I say that this could be improved.

I can't see how this argument is more solid than "in real basketball, a coach will always take into account the skills of the player". The height of certain guys gives them an advantage in picking up those skills, which is adequately reflected in the current BB system.

The only thing BB doesn't capture with the current approach is coaches who keep inferior 7-footers on their roster just because this means extra 6 fouls on Shaq when he comes to town. Frankly, I don't see how this is a big loss

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Message deleted
This Post:
00
31707.100 in reply to 31707.98
Date: 5/31/2008 11:14:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1818
I think some people give too much importance to height in a basketball game in real life.

If height was that much important Manute Ball would be the best player of all times and not Michael Jordan.

Better yet, Manute Ball would have to be better rebounder than Shaq or Rodman for instance.

And remember that Manute Ball played in the NBA, therefore I guess he had the proper training witha lvl 10 coach :P

And last but not least, if you consider heigth, u would have to consider, speed, strength, agility and other phisical aspects that aren't implemented in the game.

I think that would not make a better BuzzerBeater, and even based on real life height is not allways a good thing... Have seen lots of 7'xx guys that are really just crappy players... ;)

Just my 2 cents in a good discussion so far... ;)


Advertisement