BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Fan boycott - a theoretical exercise

Fan boycott - a theoretical exercise

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Knecht

To: Foto
This Post:
00
284063.91 in reply to 284063.89
Date: 12/30/2016 3:06:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Interesting. I'm used to it being completely forbidden. Thanks for clarifying.


It's more a case of common sense from my point of view. If I send you my mobile phone or my personal data it's clear that you can't post that. If we are discussing a fine I could have applied to you or we are talking about a cheating case or a staff decision, you can't post that either, since forum rules don't allow that.

And of course, if the title of a bb-mail is "User XXX is a cheater", it can't be posted either.


In other words.... "Quod licet jovi, non licet bovi."

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
284063.92 in reply to 284063.91
Date: 12/30/2016 3:11:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
lol man, did you just call us cows?

Last edited by Lemonshine at 12/30/2016 3:12:19 PM

From: Foto

This Post:
00
284063.93 in reply to 284063.91
Date: 12/30/2016 3:16:28 PM
Totwart
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
31483148
Second Team:
Furabolos
Iovi you mean?
No, if he publishes the content of a bb-mail or any other communication, and something of the topics I've mentioned above are on it, I would have the same opinion and ask for a removal or delete it myself.

From: Foto

This Post:
00
284063.94 in reply to 284063.90
Date: 12/30/2016 3:22:34 PM
Totwart
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
31483148
Second Team:
Furabolos
The problem with surveys is that unless the questions need only a yes/no, they are complicated to evaluate. It's something to think about though.

From: Lemonshine

To: Foto
This Post:
00
284063.95 in reply to 284063.93
Date: 12/30/2016 4:07:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Iovi you mean?
Par Toutatis et Bélénos, the conceit is strong with this one. Non classical Latin started using Juppiter, Jovis, Jovi instead of Iuppiter, Iovis, Iovi in the early middle ages. As the only Latin still used today (by ze church) has forms with the J and the expression is used in judicial (see that J appearing again instead of the I, same story, iustitia to justitia) jargon, why would you want to correct him?
L:)

Last edited by Lemonshine at 12/30/2016 4:22:46 PM

This Post:
00
284063.96 in reply to 284063.94
Date: 12/30/2016 4:13:34 PM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
As always you pick out one part of his post and let everyone think you're actually making a worthwhile reply. How about addressing the rest of his post.

This Post:
00
284063.97 in reply to 284063.88
Date: 12/30/2016 4:14:52 PM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
It's your opinion, not mine, although I wouldn't have written that. If he had posted the content of the message or it had a different and more explicit title I would agree with you. My bad that I thought it was an older message, though.
An I repeat, if he had written the content of the message I would have been the first person asking him to remove it, since private conversations can't be released unless both users agree.

Your opinion is biased.

From: Knecht

To: Foto
This Post:
00
284063.98 in reply to 284063.93
Date: 12/30/2016 4:29:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Not going to discuss latin orthography with you.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
284063.99 in reply to 284063.96
Date: 12/30/2016 4:40:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Bah, as Knecht said elsewere this is a lost cause Gully. Everyone with an average intelligence reading this will be able to draw the logical conclusions about the staff. I'm sorry that good guys like Manon and other good GMs will be lumped with their jefes. It's also blatantly clear that Foto is more inclined to swim in the mud where Perpete successfully managed to throw this thread when he derailed the conversation (I'm ashamed I did bite), than actually dealing with the real issues.

A word of warning for all of you regular guys reading this. If you think this is what the level of the staff is and it's unreasonable to expect it to be better, go look for the posts by Charles (back then BB-Charles) and RiP (for a few seasons BB-Ryan), you will understand the difference between these people and staff we had in the past and you will agree that better quality is not only possible, but should be a rational expectation for all of us.

This Post:
00
284063.100 in reply to 284063.99
Date: 12/30/2016 4:50:05 PM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
Bah, as Knecht said elsewere this is a lost cause Gully

This won't be my first lost cause. Its still my fervent belief that one day I will be able to piss into a strong wind.

From: Fresh24

To: Foto
This Post:
11
284063.101 in reply to 284063.94
Date: 12/30/2016 10:43:12 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I appreciate the reply. Admittedly, I'm not a statistician and I'm sure you can get more qualified opinions on putting together the survey but I'd recommend either 1-5 or 1-7 scales, check boxes, and potentially rankings as well as yes/no questions (although probably limit it to 8-12 questions). There could be a temporary page for it, so it could be more than just receiving bb-mails.

Advertisement