BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New Ball Rating System

New Ball Rating System (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: ezyfrag

This Post:
00
155342.93 in reply to 155342.92
Date: 8/29/2010 7:23:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
lol I bet naker gave you a ball for that post!! lol

If it wasn't for people like naker that actually puts alot of effort into his posts to make sure the info and advice is as helpful and accurate as possible.. then the help forum wouldnt be very helpful!!

From: zyler

This Post:
11
155342.94 in reply to 155342.93
Date: 8/30/2010 1:01:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
exactly im glad the naker haters actually have to step up and say something now rather then 1 balling all his posts, and stalking obscure threads to 1 ball his posts was really just pathetic.

This Post:
11
155342.96 in reply to 155342.94
Date: 8/30/2010 1:25:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
To tell you the truth I am more than a little bit dissapointed at your comment toward Naker.... from the tone and what you wrote would seem that you were actually having a go at him for all of his posts... If the old system was back you would definitely get one ball.... and please refrain from such comments in the future..

This Post:
00
155342.97 in reply to 155342.94
Date: 8/30/2010 3:05:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
stalking obscure threads to 1 ball his posts was really just pathetic.

By stalking I assume you actually mean browsing pretty much any thread on Global (English), Help (English), Suggestions, or Bugs Bugs Bugs. :-)

This Post:
22
155342.98 in reply to 155342.97
Date: 8/30/2010 3:10:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
no i mean 1 balling all his comments in a dv iv aussie thread over the space of about 2 weeks , 1 ball a day.

Last edited by zyler at 8/30/2010 3:10:41 AM

This Post:
00
155342.99 in reply to 155342.98
Date: 8/30/2010 3:13:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
Ah, okay. That's certainly pretty weak.

This Post:
00
155342.100 in reply to 155342.99
Date: 8/30/2010 3:19:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
my thoughts exactly.

From: ezyfrag

This Post:
00
155342.101 in reply to 155342.100
Date: 8/30/2010 7:31:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
Who did that??

From: zekick

This Post:
00
155342.102 in reply to 155342.33
Date: 8/30/2010 7:44:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
0The old rating system needed to be changed, and this current system is probably a slight upgrade. But there still needs to be some way to keep the frivolous posts at bay. If you don't want to have a negative rating as an option, why not show the average rating per post instead of a cumulative number?


I agree with you, that the average rating per post is necessary. But there is no reason to abolish the cumulative number.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
155342.103 in reply to 155342.101
Date: 8/30/2010 7:52:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
dont know thus the problem with the old system , people could just be "insert word"

Advertisement