BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S24

BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S24 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
243663.93 in reply to 243663.92
Date: 7/21/2013 4:20:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
Yeah a cap would add a twist to the game making teams even and therefore better competition

This Post:
00
243663.94 in reply to 243663.93
Date: 7/21/2013 5:57:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Im just using a fake scenario but , say if they put the cap on a teams money at ... lets just say $6m for an example ? If we get to $5.99m on tuesday and we have a home game , what would happen to our money if we already had basically $6m and were still getting more cash from trades and games? Would it just go to waste even though we earned that money ?

From: Bing

This Post:
00
243663.96 in reply to 243663.95
Date: 7/21/2013 7:23:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I dont like the idea of the cap going by division because I have seen teams who have been in V. leagues for the entire career and have a arena with 15k seats or more which lets me know they could have tanked but instead they put there money to a goo use and still competed while getting large revenue AND still compete in their league. But in conclusion I wouldnt mind having a cap but if the BB community were to vote on it, I wouldnt vote.

This Post:
00
243663.98 in reply to 243663.97
Date: 7/22/2013 1:57:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
In the nba the only thing keeping teams from acquiring the usa team onto a club team is a cap. so it could help BB get tougher competition amongst teams

From: Coolbobj

This Post:
00
243663.99 in reply to 243663.95
Date: 7/22/2013 10:00:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7979
I'm all for a salary cap to prevent these all star teams from forming but I dunno about a bank account cap, it's too restrictive.

From: brian

This Post:
00
243663.100 in reply to 243663.92
Date: 7/22/2013 12:43:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I've thought about these ideas and honestly it seems hopeless. If a team has 30, 40+ million there would have to be such an obscene tax % it would create all kinds of other issues. The imbalance has been created and ignored, there's not really any easy solution at this point.

I don't love the idea of a cap, but its interesting. FWIW, im running close to 1m payroll and losing at most 100k per week. When you get to the 1.25m+ range it gets beyond the point that its feasible for most teams to even try to compete. That would be the range I'd consider a cap, maybe a soft cap with a hard 1.5m cap after that. Those just seem like good round numbers. If a good 800-1m range team, run reasonably fiscally sound operations, makes a run to the knockouts its feasible to consider adding a player for the stretch run, which happens a lot in real life.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
243663.103 in reply to 243663.102
Date: 7/22/2013 6:08:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
well its up to the BB's to decide

Advertisement