BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New Ball Rating System

New Ball Rating System (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: zyler

This Post:
11
155342.94 in reply to 155342.93
Date: 8/30/2010 1:01:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
exactly im glad the naker haters actually have to step up and say something now rather then 1 balling all his posts, and stalking obscure threads to 1 ball his posts was really just pathetic.

This Post:
11
155342.96 in reply to 155342.94
Date: 8/30/2010 1:25:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
To tell you the truth I am more than a little bit dissapointed at your comment toward Naker.... from the tone and what you wrote would seem that you were actually having a go at him for all of his posts... If the old system was back you would definitely get one ball.... and please refrain from such comments in the future..

This Post:
00
155342.97 in reply to 155342.94
Date: 8/30/2010 3:05:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
stalking obscure threads to 1 ball his posts was really just pathetic.

By stalking I assume you actually mean browsing pretty much any thread on Global (English), Help (English), Suggestions, or Bugs Bugs Bugs. :-)

This Post:
22
155342.98 in reply to 155342.97
Date: 8/30/2010 3:10:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
no i mean 1 balling all his comments in a dv iv aussie thread over the space of about 2 weeks , 1 ball a day.

Last edited by zyler at 8/30/2010 3:10:41 AM

This Post:
00
155342.99 in reply to 155342.98
Date: 8/30/2010 3:13:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
Ah, okay. That's certainly pretty weak.

This Post:
00
155342.100 in reply to 155342.99
Date: 8/30/2010 3:19:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
my thoughts exactly.

From: ezyfrag

This Post:
00
155342.101 in reply to 155342.100
Date: 8/30/2010 7:31:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
Who did that??

From: zekick

This Post:
00
155342.102 in reply to 155342.33
Date: 8/30/2010 7:44:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
0The old rating system needed to be changed, and this current system is probably a slight upgrade. But there still needs to be some way to keep the frivolous posts at bay. If you don't want to have a negative rating as an option, why not show the average rating per post instead of a cumulative number?


I agree with you, that the average rating per post is necessary. But there is no reason to abolish the cumulative number.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
155342.103 in reply to 155342.101
Date: 8/30/2010 7:52:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
dont know thus the problem with the old system , people could just be "insert word"

From: Fresh24

This Post:
11
155342.104 in reply to 155342.102
Date: 8/30/2010 8:43:13 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
what does the cumulative number establish? I'd prefer either moving to a simple post count, or removing it altogether.

I do really like how individual posts are set up, because although it isn't really a product of the BB forums, a lot of other forums see many users spam by quoting and writing in +1 to posts they agree with. This is so much simpler, maybe you could identify those that +1 the posts.

Advertisement