BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Calum
This Post:
00
381.967 in reply to 381.966
Date: 2/15/2009 9:35:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Hey guys.

I just had a question about training.

Do you think that training 2 positions e.g PG/SG, equates to exactly half as much training per person as one position (PG).

Or do you think you get more overall training points (shall we say) if you train more postions to be shared out.

I'd be interested in this as it could well mean that it's a lot better to just train 1 position (if you can minute manage that is)

This Post:
00
381.968 in reply to 381.967
Date: 2/15/2009 2:32:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Very interesting question, Calum. I've always thought, perhaps incorrectly, that the total amount of training goes up as the number of positions increase, but perhaps that is not true. Training one position of course gives the most "bite" of training per player, but I think that the total is higher for 2 positions. Juice?

Pappy
This Post:
00
381.969 in reply to 381.968
Date: 2/15/2009 6:50:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I've always thought that too. Or, Assumed is more to the point.

From: Shoei
This Post:
00
381.970 in reply to 381.969
Date: 2/15/2009 11:14:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
guys can i ask your opinion on this matter?

remember way back we talk about the bb's wanting player skills to be balance through which will see more effective results in playing than those with one or 2 skills being way over than the other,a way to control this also is the wage.

being said this, i also remember a lot of people saying. some skills are easy to develop when they have other higher skills. i think the sample then was a player good inside D will influence his rebounding to improve faster.

being said about this, how do we really look at this. do we encourage one to develop 3 skills being over than other on a large gap and do some catching up or do we actually ran this by training each skill levels to be almost close or the same skill level?

Last edited by Shoei at 2/15/2009 11:16:34 PM

This Post:
00
381.971 in reply to 381.970
Date: 2/16/2009 11:26:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I trained jump range for one week and then jump shot the next week
A-185 cm-hof potential-20
B-188cm-starter-19
C-183cm-superstar-19
D-183cm-perrenial allstar-19
All got the full training both weeks
A-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in jump shot
B-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in jump shot
C-1st week: Pop in driving and jump shot. 2nd week: pop in handling
D-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in drving and jump shot

This Post:
00
381.972 in reply to 381.971
Date: 2/16/2009 1:07:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Clearly a good few weeks for you, but not really helpful until you see a second pop from these guys. You going to continue to train these areas for the next few weeks? If so, could be very helpful data...

This Post:
00
381.976 in reply to 381.974
Date: 2/20/2009 7:20:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
after a few months i doubt that it is important how many players you train. as long as you play them in the right position and minutes they get the training. still it is impossible to figure out a few things. i have a sg mvp at age of 20 and he cant pop in either OD or OS in separate trainings.

Advertisement