BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
Training Speed Analysis
1000
fouls per game
4
Scrimmage
6
/closed
1
TL Auctions aren't completing!
2
Scrimmage Ad Thread 2/27-3/4
26
CLOSED
1
Some page links broken
1
/closed
1
Officemate Invitation
2
help
2
wich tactic to use
2
Is a real PG important?
2
view live is n/a for cup
2
the finer points of tactics
2
Lost Transfer
1
wrong starters...
2
Training Speed Analysis 2
3
Compensation fees nt-players
11
Economy page
2
<
>
Favorite Folders
Training Speed Analysis
(thread closed)
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
Edju (4)
WFU03 (4)
Shoei (1)
Superfly Guy (2)
Calum (3)
squeakrico7 (1)
RiP (1)
GM-kozlodoev (2)
Ali24 (3)
run and gun TJ (1)
docend24 (1)
atabakin (1)
Lux4 (3)
left hand path (1)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
Calum
To:
Pappy ODaniel
This Post:
0
381.969
in reply to
381.968
Date: 2/15/2009 6:50:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394
I've always thought that too. Or, Assumed is more to the point.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Shoei
This Post:
0
381.970
in reply to
381.969
Date: 2/15/2009 11:14:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1
guys can i ask your opinion on this matter?
remember way back we talk about the bb's wanting player skills to be balance through which will see more effective results in playing than those with one or 2 skills being way over than the other,a way to control this also is the wage.
being said this, i also remember a lot of people saying. some skills are easy to develop when they have other higher skills. i think the sample then was a player good inside D will influence his rebounding to improve faster.
being said about this, how do we really look at this. do we encourage one to develop 3 skills being over than other on a large gap and do some catching up or do we actually ran this by training each skill levels to be almost close or the same skill level?
Last edited by Shoei at 2/15/2009 11:16:34 PM
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
run and gun TJ
This Post:
0
381.971
in reply to
381.970
Date: 2/16/2009 11:26:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
I trained jump range for one week and then jump shot the next week
A-185 cm-hof potential-20
B-188cm-starter-19
C-183cm-superstar-19
D-183cm-perrenial allstar-19
All got the full training both weeks
A-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in jump shot
B-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in jump shot
C-1st week: Pop in driving and jump shot. 2nd week: pop in handling
D-1st week: pop in jump range. 2nd week: pop in drving and jump shot
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
squeakrico7
To:
run and gun TJ
This Post:
0
381.972
in reply to
381.971
Date: 2/16/2009 1:07:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
42
Clearly a good few weeks for you, but not really helpful until you see a second pop from these guys. You going to continue to train these areas for the next few weeks? If so, could be very helpful data...
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
left hand path
To:
WFU03
This Post:
0
381.976
in reply to
381.974
Date: 2/20/2009 7:20:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
65
after a few months i doubt that it is important how many players you train. as long as you play them in the right position and minutes they get the training. still it is impossible to figure out a few things. i have a sg mvp at age of 20 and he cant pop in either OD or OS in separate trainings.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
left hand path
This Post:
0
381.978
in reply to
381.976
Date: 2/20/2009 10:36:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303
after a few months i doubt that it is important how many players you train.
It definitely is very important.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Message deleted
Disable Emoticons and Images