BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.973 in reply to 14900.971
Date: 7/14/2010 9:13:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Woah alright jerk.

A) I had better team ratings in all but one category, better PP100 in 3/5 positions, and a better tactical set-up.
B) My main point was why "Depth Chart until the 4th" means don't follow depth chart at all.

Maybe you're English is lacking in which case I find it pretty surprising you got the LA without understanding how to read.


Ahem. I believe the word you're looking for is "your."

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
14900.974 in reply to 14900.971
Date: 7/15/2010 12:12:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Basically you don't want to understand?
A. He had better defence overall. Your FG % is worse. You were close because you hit a few more 3 pointers. Looking at PP, your guards were equal, you had an edge on SF position (JS SF much?) and he destroyed you from inside. I think you would have had a better result with M2M, but you were lucky to be that close in the end anyway.
B. Depth Chart until the 4-th - coach will use the players you have selected to play (he still play's your starters if they have high stamina or are significantly better players that their subs), what happens in the 4-th quarter? it switches to let coach decide and he might switch some of your players to try to win the game.
So it does not matter which coach settings you set, if your starters are 100k salary players with great stamina and are suitable at the position they are assigned to. They will play 48 minutes if their sub is a 1k salary player. Only time they will get rest in the 4-th is when you blow someone out or get into foul trouble.
Edit:spelling:(

Last edited by Kukoc at 7/16/2010 4:59:41 AM

From: Grzegorek

This Post:
00
14900.975 in reply to 14900.974
Date: 7/16/2010 3:38:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
(25665663)

Any resonable explanation about that one?

From: Ref

This Post:
00
14900.976 in reply to 14900.975
Date: 7/16/2010 3:41:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
He had way more rebounds and took more foul shots...

This Post:
00
14900.977 in reply to 14900.975
Date: 7/16/2010 7:14:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
2-3 defence and the shape of some your guards allow him to score,despite his awful attack...with a M2M you surely had won this game

From: zyler
This Post:
00
14900.978 in reply to 14900.977
Date: 7/16/2010 11:41:06 PM
From: Azariah

This Post:
00
14900.979 in reply to 14900.978
Date: 7/16/2010 11:53:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
Rebounds, they do a BB-team good.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
14900.980 in reply to 14900.979
Date: 7/17/2010 12:41:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
yer i get hat but my center has level 14 rebounding and was out rebounded badly , i dont get how his center got so many rebounds against mine

From: DireWolf

This Post:
00
14900.981 in reply to 14900.980
Date: 7/17/2010 2:26:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
He played 2-3 which helped his defensive rebounding and you played a 3-2 which hurt your defensive rebounding (thus helping his offensive rebounding).

Since both teams played zones, i wouldn't look at the direct matchups either because technically, there weren't any.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
14900.982 in reply to 14900.981
Date: 7/17/2010 2:55:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
dire you know i know both of those things my point was my best rebounding player did nothing in the rebounding department.

my next comment would be how did his outside attack out score mine ? when you look at the rating match ups for both of us?

i still think i should have won this game by 20+ points

From: DireWolf

This Post:
00
14900.983 in reply to 14900.982
Date: 7/17/2010 3:57:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
Rebounding is also boxing out the opponent so your Center might not have pulled in a bunch himself but might have helped others get the rebound. Or maybe he just had an off game and struggled against the 2-3 and 3-2 advantages.

I agree it does look like one of those games you should have won purely looking at ratings because the only thing that you can point to as losing is the rebounding count. Losing the rebounding count by 25 is huge though and could definitely be a difference maker in any game.

Advertisement