BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67212.98 in reply to 67212.96
Date: 1/7/2009 10:49:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Then I suggest you organize something in defense of power forwards, since an overwhelming majority of them perform strictly better at the C position


The difference is PF have the ability to be trained up from the PF position (JS for forwards, 1on1 for forwards, plus all the bundled PF/C inside skills). People just arent utilizing them all that much, or feel they are not worth the investment in training.

It's not an option for SF.

Even if your example was correct, why would pointing out another similar situation that could use improvement negate the need for the improvement being suggested in this thread?

That's like saying, for example:

"You can't advocate for greener energy alternatives from oil, look at all the coal being used!"

Um, why not work to address both?

Last edited by brian at 1/7/2009 10:50:20 AM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Mike

This Post:
00
67212.99 in reply to 67212.95
Date: 1/7/2009 10:55:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Brian, kozlodoev: cool it! Characterizations like this don't take the discussion anywhere.

From: brian

To: Mike
This Post:
00
67212.100 in reply to 67212.99
Date: 1/7/2009 10:58:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
You're right. It's difficult to process these things before I type them, probably because I'm allergic to thinking.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
67212.102 in reply to 67212.93
Date: 1/7/2009 11:47:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The primary skills of a PF are almost the same of a center,and this is right also for P and SG.So,if i want to train my guard he could play well in both the position of G,and so on my center-forward
but if i want to train a player in both the types of skill,he never could play at SF position,in same time your center had to change position for his training only for few weeks,and this is true also for your guard
A Sf to train himself never can play in his position(3 postion training...very bad)

This Post:
00
67212.103 in reply to 67212.102
Date: 1/7/2009 11:52:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Don't you get it? SF can play as PF or as SG. If you want him to play at SF you need to use 3 spot training. My SF can play those spots easily so perhaps look at the TL to get a better suited SF before you start to train him.
SF is all around player so he should be able to play all those positions just like PF can play SF and SG can play SF.
Adapt!

This Post:
00
67212.104 in reply to 67212.103
Date: 1/7/2009 12:09:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
and you now ant to tell me this?I am training a great SF,i know how he had to play...but i could train and my players could play in both the roles because i'm not in an high division,so i not lose so much.But if i need in post season for example to train him,i cannot risk to lose playoff because of it,i could have the possibility to make him play in his position

This Post:
00
67212.105 in reply to 67212.104
Date: 1/7/2009 12:20:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Wow!
So ok once again because you can't seem to understand. When you want to play your SF at SF spot and get training (when there are extream Important playoff games etc) then use 3 spot training or train SF in something else that week(s). If you are not afraid of losing and your most important thing is to train that one player then you could play him at a spot that has single spot training.
Now I am done with this topic about let's make this game simple so it will not be a challenge. What I like here is that there is no easy way out and you have to think and make long run plans.
This topic is moving in the direction that every spot has to have 1 spot training in every skill available in this game. <- if SF get's single spot training and whiners win then it will eventually come to the previously explained outcome (read before the arrow).

This Post:
00
67212.107 in reply to 67212.105
Date: 1/7/2009 12:34:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404

This topic is moving in the direction that every spot has to have 1 spot training in every skill available in this game. <- if SF get's single spot training and whiners win then it will eventually come to the previously explained outcome (read before the arrow).

I understand,but i dont'agree with you
If a player could make a pop in Id in three wekks and in OD in another three weeks,with the new training he make 2 pops,one in Id and one in Od in six weeks,rand there are not so great advantages also because i could train only two players,so this training regime it's only a way to make possible(not to make this as THE PERFECT CHOISE)to play for a SF in his role,rather in a long run it is a disadvantage because with this system however i had to have good trainees in both departments,so my team will growing faster
And you continue to say that with 3 spot training is possible to train a player...
This it's not right and not good...

This Post:
00
67212.108 in reply to 67212.105
Date: 1/7/2009 1:26:42 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
as a former SF trainer i think the problem is NOT playing the SF as SG/PF. they have the skills to be ok in the role
the real problem is you also have to play your SG/PF as SF

as now i stopped training SF because i got promoted from IV to III
i shifted to a PF/C training regime because in III putting my players out of role would mean automatically relegation

Advertisement