BuzzerBeater Forums

Is it frustrating that there is those few days that the age lines up? Sure. Is it cheating if someone trains an 18 or 19yo draftee for a year and sells him when he sees what he has drafted the following year? No. I highly doubt anyone is deliberately “scamming” you by listing a player about to turn 19. They’re in their rights to sell their players for whatever they think they can get. It literally tells you when the player was drafted. Surely buyer beware is a factor here.

Thanks Phoenix. I agree with you completely. I have been playing since season 23, so I am not new. But, I have never even noticed this before, and in that aspect, I would be a “newbie”. And to the response before, sure, the guy can list his player at any time, but, you can easily tell that the guy was trying to catch this loophole, which would be, exploiting. Exploiting the game in any way is cheating. Just because you can do it, doesn’t mean it’s ethical. It’s something that should not be allowed at all, and there should be no days where a 19 year old is listed as an 18 year old. The fix would be to hold listing new transfers at the start of offseason processing, and open new transfers back up at the conclusion of offseason processing. Players would still be able to see their new draftees, just as they always have, but this loophole to take advantage of people, wouldn’t exists anymore at all. Also, if you think this wasn’t done deliberately, like Phoenix said, you are delusional. I did reach out to the player, and I asked him to do what was right, and bid on his own guy. He can then relist him as a 19 year old, which would be the ethical thing to do. The GMs wouldn’t have to get involved at all if he did that. He is ignoring my messages, and doesn’t care to reply, which, only strengthens the assumption that this was done on purpose. Done purposely, this is flat out cheating the game by exploiting a loophole. It’s also taking advantage of fellow owners, which is not something that should be involved in this game. Period. Like I said before, if I accidentally clicked bid while scrolling, or paid 200k for a player who is only worth 50k, ok, shame on me. This is clearly different, and I shouldn’t have to pay for someone else exploiting a loophole, which shouldn’t exists at all. Mistakes happen, and lessons get learned, but this is something that should never happen at all, to anyone. It shouldn’t matter if they looked deep at the player or not. 18 year olds should be 18 year olds, and 19 years olds should be 19. It’s pretty simple.

Is it frustrating that there is those few days that the age lines up? Sure. Is it cheating if someone trains an 18 or 19yo draftee for a year and sells him when he sees what he has drafted the following year? No. I highly doubt anyone is deliberately “scamming” you by listing a player about to turn 19. They’re in their rights to sell their players for whatever they think they can get. It literally tells you when the player was drafted. Surely buyer beware is a factor here.

Not scamming him in particular, but I can tell you that I can prove few managers do this every single post-season.

GM-Perpete had spoken... Its the "The Old Red Notification" probably is coming... and that would be Great!

I hope everyone reading this reports this as cheating. Now that the 19 year old age has flipped over, it says these players have sold recently for 50 and 100k. That’s all this player is worth. Sure, those numbers are just an estimate, but his value is nowhere close to 1.8 million. Even if you say he is worth 200k, it’s still a 1.6 million dollar overbid. Worst case scenario, I don’t get my money back, but at least they would adjust the amount of money he gets out of it. He would end up getting 100 or 200k, instead of profiting 1.8 million on a gross overbid. The BBs I’ve talked to said to report this as cheating to the GMs. If enough people do it, this will be taken care of, one way or another.

Are yous ure BBs told you this is "cheating"? Because I don't think so by any means... Okey, it might be a dirty move, but not a cheating move.

I agree with BFaye, you shouldn't need managers to do a work-around to figure out the correct player age during the offseason. It's a bug. I would suggest posting this in the bugs forum.

For BB Devs - If advancing player age is not possible to do in a timely manner during the offseason processing, I would suggest the BB's freeze bidding on the transfer list while the season upgrade is happening.

This problem also affects people shopping for older players where it would be impossible to determine their real age, and DMI would not be zero like it is for new 18yo's.

I don't see how it would be possible to block the transfer market in an efficient way to stop what happened to you

No need to block the TL. A viable workaround would be to generate new draftees as 17/18 yo and then let them age together with all other players.

That said, I like it as it is now. Creates opportunities.